But soon enough, his massive budget cuts will hurt real people, and it will be impossible to shrug off that news. And it appears Miami might be right in the crosshairs of one of his worst plans.
According to a
As any seasoned Miamian knows, NOAA operates both the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Service, the latter of which is based
The biggest cut, however, is aimed squarely at NOAA's National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS), the agency's main weather-satellite division. Political analysts say the cuts look like an act of revenge: The NESDIS is one of NOAA's major wings studying climate-change and has published studies showing that the effects of climate change are accelerating, which has enraged some Republicans.
In response, Trump wants to rip money away from the organization — apparently with little regard as to how those cuts would affect cities like Miami when the next major tropical storm boils up. Sure, other agencies around the world study tropical cyclones, but NOAA's satellite division remains a
Cutting funding from the division would disregard the safety of people living in hurricane-prone areas such as Miami.
According to NOAA's website, NESDIS satellites pull in 20 terabytes of data per day while scanning the globe. NOAA says NESDIS satellites were vital in tracking the path of Hurricane Katrina, the costliest and deadliest hurricane in American history. The NESDIS has since launched a new satellite, GOES-R, that can take full storm photographs every 30 seconds, "significantly improving hurricane forecasting and tracking and providing longer watch and warning lead times for areas in harm's way," NOAA says.
Not just the United States depends on openly shared NESDIS data for extreme weather event monitoring. The whole world does.— Emily Lakdawalla (@elakdawalla) March 4, 2017
Last year's Hurricane Matthew debacle shows that NESDIS satellites are vital: Even with the most advanced technology known to humankind, forecasters still weren't able to accurately plot the storm's path until the hurricane made landfall around Jacksonville. If anything, Matthew's story shows that NOAA needs more funding, not less, to study hurricanes.
But such is the case for Trump's science-denying administration. NOAA is simply in the business of tracking weather and climate data. And in 2017, tracking the weather also means tracking climate change. You cannot do one without the other, but it appears the Trump administration has chosen to find this out the hard way.