Yesterday was not a good day for theMiami Herald
or its parent company, McClatchy. The two top editors atEl Nuevo Herald
announced they were leaving because,according to the editor and publisher
, they couldn't stomach slashing more newsroom jobs. Ina positive spin
on their departures that appeared on theHerald
's website yesterday, reporter Andres Viglucci putHerald
circulation numbers at around 190,000.
That's a drop of 50,000 subscribers in the past year, according to the blog McClatchy Watch, which is basing its estimate on Audit Bureau of Circulation numbers.
And as Random Pixels pointed out yesterday, the Herald circulation drop is staggering, especially when one considers that in 1985 the paper pulled in close to half a million readers a day.
There is no glee on our part that this is happening. Even with a much
diminished staff, the Herald has news gathering resources that no other
media outlet in the market comes close to matching. As Bob Norman
recently pointed out, when cities lose daily papers, or when they cut
back on reporting jobs to the extent that certain communities and
government agencies go uncovered, we all lose.
And the Herald, for all its problems, still continues to do fantastic
work. Its top-notch Borrower's Betrayed series, which recently won the
Scripps Howard National Journalism Award, did as good a job as any
piece on explaining how the mortgage meltdown happened in Florida.
Unfortunately, until somebody figures out how to make money off the web
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
(where all the readers are going one hopes), circulation and ad
dollars are going to continue to drop, which means more layoffs, making
it harder and harder for the Herald to do the kind of journalism it
has built its name on. And that's bad for all of us.