Starbucks vs. Ghiradelli: Hot Chocolate Battle

With cooler

nights upon us once again, what's more comforting than curling up

with your significant other and a cup of hot chocolate? Here's a look

at two chains, located on Lincoln Road, serving up some winter

delight with whipped cream on top!



Starbucks

Pros: The coffee chain's version (grande - 16 oz. - $3.25) is

made with steamed milk and vanilla and mocha-flavored syrups. It is

topped with sweetened whipped cream and a chocolate-flavored drizzle.

The end result is a creamy taste that isn't too chocolaty.

Cons: It's a bit sweet and ours wasn't

delivered so hot. Total grams of fat: 16 grams. Calories: 370.

Calories from fat: 140. Looks like that New Year's resolution isn't

working out so great.


Ghirardelli

Pros: Start to finish, the sea salt hot

cocoa is a sweet and savory delight. From the bottom up, it's

constructed with Ghirardelli's standard hot cocoa mix and caramel,

topped with whipped cream, a caramel drizzle, and two shakes of a sea

salt and raw sugar blend.



Cons: The nutrition facts weren't

provided online or via the store manager. And $4.25 is a bit much for

a 16 oz. non-alcoholic beverage. Oh well, there could be worse

vices.

The Verdict: Ghirardelli's hot cocoa looks, tastes,

and is made like a hand-crafted malt shop drink, whereas the

Starbucks drink tastes like it came off an assembly line. Spend about

a buck more and treat your honey to a perfect winter beverage.



Follow Short Order on Facebook and Twitter @Short_Order.

KEEP MIAMI NEW TIMES FREE... Since we started Miami New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Miami, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
John Zur