Top

news

Stories

 

Swept Under the Bridge

Sex offenders are ordered to sleep near a center for abused kids

It's 5:45 a.m. and still completely dark when a car pulls off NW Twelfth Avenue and makes its way silently through the complex of streets just south of the county criminal court. The car turns into the jury parking lot, otherwise completely empty. It creeps past the massive concrete pillars under the State Road 836 bridge, makes an abrupt turn, and stops. The door opens and a stocky, middle-aged man exits. He walks over to a pile of cardboard, bends down, picks up a flap, and peeps. Then he does the same to a pile of rags. Finally he re-enters his car and leaves. After a minute, the rags and cardboard begin to stir — three men stand up and begin packing their things.

"They're just waiting for us to violate," says Wiese, "so they can throw us back in."
ISAIAH THOMPSON
"They're just waiting for us to violate," says Wiese, "so they can throw us back in."

The men are convicted sex offenders. The car, which visits every morning before dawn, belongs to Benito Casal, a state Department of Corrections (DOC) probation officer who enforces their 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. curfew. If they aren't under the bridge between those hours, he will have them hunted down and arrested.

The men sleep near each other in a row, partly for protection from just-released inmates who wander out from the county jail that is just around the corner. They store their bedding — a couple of boxes, torn blankets, and plastic sheets — behind the chainlink fence that separates their concrete home from a muddy embankment they use to relieve themselves and shower (they accomplish this by filling a bag with water and poking holes in it).

They live a block away from Kristi House, a treatment center for victims of child sexual assault. They're also within 1000 feet of two day-care centers — a violation of state law — and less than 2500 feet from eight schools, a breach of county ordinance.

"I don't know what I can say except that I'm certainly not happy that there are registered sexual offenders living within 500 feet of the child advocacy center," says Trudy Novicki, executive director of Kristi House. Novicki was never told that sex offenders lived under the bridge opposite her building. "It's a county parking lot; how can you live in a county parking lot?" Novicki plans to look into the matter with "the police department and the county parking authority and probation and anyone else I can think of."

Court files, DOC documents, and probation case notes reveal that state authorities are not only aware the three sleep at the location just north of the Miami River — they sent them there. Unable or unwilling to find housing for the offenders as they left prison, probation officers Benito Casal, Kimilyn Cohen, and Robert Leiry began sending them to the bridge more than six months ago. Several circuit court judges may have known of the placement. Miami-Dade Police are aware of their location as well. Two of them list their address in the county's sex crimes bureau database as NW Twelfth Avenue and Twelfth Street, and the third is incorrectly registered as living at his victim's address.

Probation officers declined comment, referring New Times to public information officer Gretl Plessinger, who says they tried and failed to find a residence that did not conflict with state and local law. "Probation officers just don't know what to do with cases like this," she says. "I know we have people who are working on this issue, but I don't know if they've come to any conclusions, yet."

Indeed no one seems to have drawn a conclusion about housing sex offenders, especially those who leave prison homeless, but there have been plenty of ideas for where not to house them. Following the Jessica Lunsford murder in 2005, Miami Beach effectively barred sex offenders from moving to the city. Miami-Dade County responded the same year with its own rule, prohibiting offenders from living within a half-mile of a school. Across the country, similar laws have gone into effect: California voters approved a statewide referendum cracking down on sex offenders; Tampa recently considered banning them; and Suffolk County in New York recently proposed housing them in trailers that would move from place to place.

According to Miami-Dade Sex Crimes Bureau Lt. Ronald Rebozo, there are 27 homeless offenders in the county. But the number is suspiciously low, because it does not count those whose whereabouts are unknown. In March 2005 the Miami Herald reported that at least 1800 offenders had gone missing statewide. Miami-Dade had 243 missing, the most of any county in the state. In the last couple of weeks Rebozo's bureau has boasted of a series of crackdowns on offenders who have changed residence without notifying police. The men under the bridge haven't heard a peep of it.

Rebozo says he is looking into the illegal location. "Currently we are investigating the residency restriction violations," his office wrote in an e-mail responding to written questions.

Sanchez, Carrasquillo, and Wiese have been sleeping under the bridge by the courthouse for between two and six months. They all contend that they were told to report there immediately after their release from prison, and probation case notes confirm their story.

Angel Sanchez, whom the men call "pops," is 65 years old and was born in Puerto Rico. He was arrested on May 15, 2003, and charged with two counts of sexual battery after a relative reported he had been molesting her for "approximately five years," according to the court file. Sanchez had digitally penetrated her vagina at first when she was around nine years old. When she was thirteen years old, three weeks before she finally turned him in, Sanchez attempted to rape her.

Designated a sexual predator, he spent only a year in prison. On May 11, 2005, Sanchez was released and reported to a probation office, where his officer — then Esperanza Alfonso — had him arrested on the spot, ostensibly for failing to have cab fare to get to a temporary residence she had arranged in Hialeah. He was jailed for fifteen more months.

While he was locked up this second time, his new probation officer, Casal, looked into at least two assisted living facilities, but according to his notes, all proved to be within illegal range of a school, park, or day care. Casal called homeless shelters and found they either wouldn't take sex offenders or couldn't because of their location.

Ronald Book, chairman of the Miami-Dade Homeless Trust, states in no uncertain terms that he wants nothing to do with the problem of homeless sex offenders. "I don't take them — I won't take them into our programs," he says bluntly. "I don't have enough resources to build a program to house sexual offenders, and at the end of the day, I cannot."

The idea to stash offenders under the bridge seems to have originated within a county probation office; very possibly it was Casal himself who started the practice. On June 12, 2006, Casal's notes indicate that he notified the court that "if the subject is released without a residence, I will have to place him under the bridge...." Sanchez would be sharing the location, the probation officer added, "with another sex offender that is residing there." The other offender is not identified, and it's unclear whether there were others before him.

On August 17, 2006, Casal ordered Sanchez under the bridge. But he wasn't acting alone. According to his notes, he informed a probation officer named Ilzee Rabel, who works in Circuit Court Judge Diane Ward's division, of his decision. Whether Ward herself was ever told is unclear. She didn't return several phone calls or an e-mail seeking comment. But one thing is clear: By this past February 9 Casal had visited the site near the child abuse center at least 118 times to enforce Sanchez's curfew.

"They treat us like animals," Sanchez says, "putting us down here. It's not right, it's not just."

Marco Carrasquillo, also Puerto Rican, was next to arrive. The short and wiry 45-year-old pled guilty to sodomizing an eleven-year-old boy, a relative, while holding a knife to his throat in 1997. He faced a possible life sentence, but plea-bargained for twelve years in prison, ten of probation, and sex predator status.

Carrasquillo was released this past January 3 and sent to Camillus House, where he spent a night before reporting back to the probation office the next morning. That day a probation supervisor, Dawn Dinatale, contacted a circuit office of the probation department "whom advised that [Carrasquillo] is to sleep under bridge located at corner of NW Thirteenth Street and Twelfth Avenue," according to case notes. Later, probation officer Kimlynn Cohen sent him there. "Defendant cannot sleep at Camillus House, must sleep under bridge," Cohen wrote.

He has been there every night since. Carrasquillo claims that Circuit Court Judge Cristina Pereyra-Shuminer, who didn't return phone messages, knew he was being sent to the muddy location. "I told the judge to let me back into prison," Carrasquillo says. "If I'd have known this was going to happen, I'd have finished my eight years there."

Patrick Wiese, also 45 years old, arrived under the bridge two days after Carrasquillo. Emaciated and toothless, he sleeps in a long cardboard box that looks like a coffin. He was arrested in late 2005 for molesting his nine-year-old stepdaughter and sentenced to a year, followed by ten years of probation.


When it came time for his release this past January 12, Weise was taken to a probation office at NW 167th Street and 36th Avenue. There, he says, probation officer Robert Laier told him he was telephoning Circuit Court Judge Reemberto Diaz to learn where Wiese would be sent. The homeless man says that Laier made the call, hung up, and said that he would be living under the bridge. "A person goes to prison, does his time. They're supposed to help him," Wiese says bitterly. "They do help others, but what do they do to us? Stick us under a damn bridge."

Diaz, who was appointed to the Eleventh Judicial Circuit by Gov. Jeb Bush last June, is the only judge who agreed to discuss the case. He says he cannot recall being informed of any offender sent to live in the jury parking lot and adamantly denies ever giving instructions to anyone to do so. He blames probation officers for Wiese's placement. "I can't say where to put them," he says. "We let probation deal with it."

It's hard to imagine a situation that is less safe for anyone. The rate of recidivism among sex offenders is high, and except for Casal's predawn checks, the men are left almost entirely to their own devices. Wiese and Carrasquillo have gone together several times to a day labor center on Flagler Street and registered for work. Wiese says he almost got a job "digging holes," but it fell through. Carrasquillo says he has looked for dishwashing work since he left prison, but hasn't found any.

And then there is the disturbing issue of treatment: Besides a compulsory weekly meeting with other offenders, there isn't any. "The only reason I can think that they put us here," Wiese reflects, "is that they're just waiting for us to violate, so they can throw us back in."

Meanwhile, the problem of homeless sex offenders isn't going away. Just four weeks ago, Circuit Court Judge Rosa Rodriguez had a sex offender in court named Ivan Daniels, whose family had agreed to take him in. The family's home, however, was too close to a day care or school. The offender's probation officer, Rodriguez was told, had found another solution. "It was a bridge by Twelfth and Twelfth, by the courthouse," she recalls. Rodriguez says she was shocked. "I said to the defendant, öLook, I'll release you, it's your right — but I don't want you to have further problems or to be in a situation where you're out there, where there's maybe drugs.' So after conferring with his attorney, they decided the better option was for him to stay in jail."

 
  • Christopher 10/27/2008 1:33:00 PM

    Although I have not completely read your article understand that just because a probation officer tells an ex offender to be at a certain location between the hours of 10pm to 6am does not mean that the offender resides there. Further, because the parking lot of the Court house or under the Tuttle for that matter can not be considered a legal residency by any stretch of the imagination, the ex offenders "Hang out there" are in no way violating any state, County or City Ordinance. Residency restrictions do not restrict the sex offender from sitting on a bench in or near the very playground which serves to restrict his residency. That same offender can operate his car and �cruise� the area around the very daycare which serves to restrict his residency. He can return to the family home from which he was forced to move, on a daily basis if he so chooses, provided he does not sleep there, and peer out the window in deviant lust at the toddlers frolicking on the playground. While doing so, provided he can conceal his act of self gratification from public view, he can even masturbate. He can do all these things legally, without offending the residency restrictions. Unbelievably,residency restrictions do not even prevent a sex offender from taking up or resuming residency with the victim of his prior lascivious conduct, such as a teenage stepdaughter, so long as the home is located outside of the prohibited zone. If what we seek is to protect children from sex offenders, how do we accomplish that aim by imposing a 2500-foot residency restriction around schools, playgrounds, daycare facilities and the like? If the offender is still permitted to visit and linger in such areas for protracted periods, so long as he does not sleep there, what actual protection have we provided our children? In truth, residency restrictions appear to be little more than a political placebo, offering false comfort to pacify the public�s fear of sex offenders. Martin J. Sheehan Kenton District Judge

  • Christopher 10/27/2008 1:21:00 PM

    Although I must admit that i have not read your whole articule, understand that sex offenders that are told to be at a certain location between the hours of 10pm and 6am does not in its self mean they live there. In fact because the parking lot of the Court house or the tuttle are not considered legal residencies by any stretch of the imagination these offenders are not in violation of any State, County or City ordinance. "Residency restrictions do not restrict the sex offender from sitting on a bench in or near the very playground which serves to restrict his residency. That same offender can operate his car and �cruise� the area around the very daycare which serves to restrict his residency. He can return to the family home from which he was forced to move, on a daily basis if he so chooses, provided he does not sleep there, and peer out the window in deviant lust at the toddlers frolicking on the playground. While doing so, provided he can conceal his act of self gratification from public view, he can even masturbate. He can do all these things legally, without offending the residency restrictions. Unbelievably, residency restrictions do not even prevent a sex offender from taking up or resuming residency with the victim of his prior lascivious conduct, such as a teenage stepdaughter, so long as the home is located outside of the prohibited zone. If what we seek is to protect children from sex offenders, how do we accomplish that aim by imposing a 2500-foot residency restriction around schools, playgrounds, daycare facilities and the like? If the offender is still permitted to visit and linger in such areas for protracted periods, so long as he does not sleep there, what actual protection have we provided our children? In truth, residency restrictions appear to be little more than a political placebo, offering false comfort to pacify the public�s fear of sex offenders" Martin J. Sheehan Kenton District Judge

  • richard clark 01/24/2008 7:47:00 PM

    i am the one that you talked to in front of the miami rescue mission. you asked about the green shirts the ones that are suppose to help us homeless. and i have not heared from you sence. the main problem with the green shirts is that they come from the court. when the judge says program or prison. they were not infront of them for being responcibe. and they are NOT taught responcibility at all. so they can only abuse the authority they are given. (like retailiation and favortism etc just like the program people in the missions.) i am still interested in telling you what it is, for i am NOT an inabler to the missions like alot of the people here. awaiting email richard clark

  • Gabriel Karophilovich 11/21/2007 5:32:00 PM

    Great reporting, especially the line "The rate of recidivism among sex offenders is high", you make it appear it's a fact by stating it matter-of-factly. That type of propoganda is preciesley what this country needs. Why bother checking facts (like the the completely useless fact that as a group sex offenders have the LOWEST recidivism rates among all types of crime and the fact that the lower tiered, the lesser crimes, have an almost non existent return rate.) So good work, we need more reporting that that says 'to hell with the facts, to hell with study after studt, to hell with checking sources, I'm going to report what I THINK I KNOW and then it will become fact" It was a great article until I hit that line. You should be fired for putting an unresearched, ignorant social opinion in there. Idiot Gab

  • Sam 04/13/2007 4:45:00 AM

    "They treat us like animals," Sanchez says, "putting us down here. It's not right, it's not just." I think anyone who sexually rapes & penetrates a child IS AN ANIMAL.

  • Leon Dekelbaum 04/07/2007 4:01:00 PM

    Look, It's easy to say, "good, let them suffer the rest of their lives"" which they will. But you are setting up a system for failure. You can argue they should pay for the rest of their lives, but at least from a practical standpoint, if you drive these men to the point of utter desperation with no hope, they have nothing left to lose. If freedom is worse than jail, then the punishment of jail has no value. And this isn't biblical times anyway, people do have a right to atone for their sins, serve their time and have some sort of a semblance of a life. People do bad things, but they deserve a second chance to prove themselves. If you not only deprive them of any sort of rehabilitation program but also any chance to work, live, even have electricity, what is their incentive not to recind. You need to make staying out of prison remotely appealing. Stop this eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth bs. We don't live in biblical times.This is a really miserable way to deal with a problem, lynch mob mentality, drive the undesirables underground with illogical legislation. Social problems require well thought out solutions.

  • Amy Lea 04/07/2007 4:00:00 AM

    Far better than they deserve for their crimes. These rapists and predators get to live while their young victims must struggle every day with what happened to them. May the alligators get these criminals and do to them what our laws refuse to. I applaud whoever thought up the idea of making them live without comforts of law-abiding citizens. And those that find these rapists living under a bridge disgraceful? Your opinion would change if it was *your* young child who was raped.

  • Amy 04/07/2007 3:59:00 AM

    Far better than they deserve for their crimes. These rapists and predators get to live while their young victims must struggle every day with what happened to them. May the alligators get these criminals and do to them what our laws refuse to. I applaud whoever thought up the idea of making them live without comforts of law-abiding citizens. And those that find these rapists living under a bridge disgraceful? Your opinion would change if it was *your* young child who was raped.

  • Amy 04/07/2007 3:58:00 AM

    Far better than they deserve for their crimes. These rapists and predators get to live while their young victims must struggle every day with what happened to them. May the alligators get these criminals and do to them what our laws refuse to. I applaud whoever thought up the idea of making them live without comforts of law-abiding citizens. And those that find these rapists living under a bridge disgraceful? Your opinion would change if it was *your* young child who was raped.

  • Miami Resident 04/06/2007 4:00:00 AM

    What an embarrassment to Miami

  • Sara 03/14/2007 8:55:00 PM

    This is a fantastic article on a very troubling issue. I would like to see some follow up in a few months. Specifically--where can sex offenders live in Miami-Dade? Telling sex offenders where not to live without giving them options of where to live essentially encourages them to literally get lost. Once out of the supervisin of the criminal justice system, offenders are left to their own devices and instincts. Considering that their instincts have proven problematic in the past, it's obvious that the system is setting up these individuals to fail.

  • rukidding 03/09/2007 10:22:00 AM

    This is nothing short of horrifying from humanitarian, correctional, and public safety perspectives. These are not people who easily garner our sympathy - they have sexually abused children and deserved jail time. Many people would say that they are getting what they deserve. However, public safety is not served when offenders have nothing to lose. Why not give in to those pesky thoughts of sick sexual gratification? Given their sex offender status, they are unable to find jobs, and state and local residency restrictions make it impossible for them to secure even temporary shelter housing. They are receiving no treatment or other services to reintegrate them into the community. We give them nothing and make it impossible for them to function. All research shows that all offenders do much better when they have stable jobs, housing, and support. These men have been deprived of all of that. Yes, sex offenders deserve punishment appropriate to their crimes. Once they are released, they need opportunities to succeed - not setups for failure. Remember that their failure could be a new sex offense. Why not? They have nothing left to lose.

 
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy