Florida Food Freedom Act? Just Say No
Should small farmers be required to obtain state and local licensing, certification and inspection requirements, and have to go through the same rigorous safety testing as large, corporate farms? Senator Carey Baker, R-Eustis, doesn't think so. He proposed the Florida Food Freedom Act this month, which is meant to exempt small farmers from the Florida Food Safety Act passed in 1939. Those like Baker who back this bill argue that regulations and fees from that original Act were meant for large agricultural operators that sell wholesale, and believe that exemption from such fees would encourage the expansion of farmers' markets and roadside stands, and overall make locally grown food more easily obtainable for consumers. As much as I'd like to side with the small farmer against big bad federal regulators, I couldn't disagree more. In fact, to cut back on food safety procedures at a time when more and more people are falling victim to foodbourne-related illnesses -- about 5,000 Americans die each year from eating bad food -- would be as insane as loosening financial regulations on banks while hedge funds were running amok. Oh right, now I get it: Baker is a Republican.
Terry McElroy, spokesman for The Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services has it right when he says that the regulations are
designed to protect the public's health. "The problem is, whether you
buy a dozen eggs from a farm or a quart of milk from a farm or from the
biggest supermarket chain in Florida, you have to have the same
standards. People can get just as sick or sicker, maybe not as many
people, from that milk from the farm or from strawberries from the
Question: What would prevent you from buying eggs infected with E. coli at a local food market?
Question: Would the purveyor of bad eggs be subject to any penalty?
Answer: None whatsoever, other than bad word of mouth.
Question: What if you died from eating said eggs?
Answer: Still: Just bad word of mouth -- although not from you.
If Baker has his way, in place of all the sanitary testing, production
site inspections, etc., all a person would have to do to sell food
directly to a consumer is take a course to become a certified food
safety manager. And how small would a farm have to be for this
exemption? I bet it wouldn't have to be that small -- and then an
amendment here, a loophole there, and larger farms would be exempt, and
then we would, as the Republicans like to say, "have government off our
backs". And 50,000 of us, unencumbered by government rules, would die of food poisoning each year. Or maybe we'll just get real sick, and thanks to selfish Republican assholes like Sen. Baker we won't be privy to health care. (BTW-This guy is vying to be Florida's Commissioner of Agriculture!)
Lower fees for small farm inspections and such? If they are currently
exorbitant, then sure. But do away with inspections altogether on the
assumption that there are no unscrupulous small farmers/businesspeople
out there? Please.
Get the Dining Newsletter
The week's top local food news and events, plus interviews with chefs and restaurant owners, dining tips, and a peek at our print review.