NPR, WaPo Refuse to Report That Outrage Is About Crist
You've probably already heard about
Since you live in Florida, you've probably also heard that the film prominently features our own tanned gubernatorial whiz-kid and maybe gay guy Charlie Crist. In part through some fine reporting by New Times' own Bob Norman, the film offers no proof that Florida's guv loves dudes... "just a lot of compelling evidence," in Norman's words.
But you won't be hearing Crist's name in many national reviews of the film, apparently. In their reviews this week, both the Washington Post and NPR declined to name Crist as one of the pols targeted by the film.
The decision has kicked up a shitstorm at NPR, where critic Nathan Lee demanded his byline be pulled from his review after editors removed all references to Crist and former Idaho Sen. Larry "Wide Stance" Craig from the story without telling Lee.
How exactly do you review a film about outing major national politicians without, you know, talking about the politicians at the heart of the film? Read NPR and the Washington Post's yellow-bellied responses after the jump.
This passage comes from Dan Zak's review in today's Washington Post:
The long, sordid saga of former Idaho senator Larry Craig is the axis
on which the movie spins, but "Outrage" comes down hardest on another
prominent politician whose name we won't print here. Why? He has denied
repeatedly that he is gay, and there has been no substantiated reports
in mainstream media about any homosexual relationships or
transgressions. (Director Kirby Dick would hate this last sentence,
since his movie also targets the media for their laziness and bias.)
Dick has structured "Outrage" around this particular politician,
gathering compelling evidence and interviews to support his case and
suggesting that this man's hypocrisy is all the more dangerous because
he may be bound for a 2012 presidential run.
And here's NPR's even more vague statement:
Given the nature of this film's media critique and the NPR
editorial policy mentioned above, the writer has asked that his byline
be removed from this review.
Read all about critic Nathan Lee's clash with NPR at our sister paper, the Village Voice, where Lee used to work. Lee attempted to leave a comment after the story, explaining why his byline wasn't used, and then NPR also removed the comment. We'll post his reponse here as well:
"I asked that my name be removed in protest of NPR's policy of not
'naming names' of closeted or rumored-about politicians -- even those
who actively suppress gay rights, and thus whose sexual identities are
of significant importance to the press. I personally disagree with
NPR's policy -- there is no other area of 'privacy' that elicits such
extreme tact, and also feel that it is a professional affront to my
responsibility as a critic to discuss the content of a work of art, and
an impingememnt of my First Amendment right to free speech and the
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
- Facebook Killer Derek Medina Found Guilty
- St. Louis Rams Player Stedman Bailey Expected to Survive After Drive-By Shooting in...
- With Beckham's Little Havana Stadium Just About Dead, Overtown Could Be Next