I Know a Thing or Two about Beauty Pageants

Letters from the Issue of January 8, 2004

And this one is anything but beautiful: Thanks to Forrest Norman for his article about Mario Princigalli and his Miss Cuban-American pageant ("Tiara Squirm-a!" December 25). I competed in this year's pageant and I had a terrible experience. My parents were forced to pay for one item after another and were obligated to make various donations to Mario and his mother.

The pageant is one lie after another. The title is "Cuban-American" yet there is nothing American about it. Some of the girls didn't even speak English. I was raised in the U.S. and am proud of it, but was told to downplay my American pride. When the judges asked me how I felt about social issues concerning Cuba, I responded honestly but it wasn't what they wanted to hear. My platform, the AIDS crisis in Africa, didn't interest them.

This isn't a real pageant decided by judges. Mario chooses the winners himself weeks before the event. Everyone knew which girl would win the various titles. I'm not new to pageants; I know what goes on, and this is the worst of the worst. It gives Cuban Americans a bad name.

Directors from my modeling agency wanted to support me in the pageant but Mario's mother Gloria told me it would be unethical to have them supporting me. She went as far as to tell me that I wasn't refined enough to win beauty pageants -- this despite the fact that I've held titles such as Miss Pan-American, Miss Jewish Florida America, and Miss Continental. Currently I hold the title of Miss Israel-USA.

Esther Perez Dollar


The FTAA Was a Success but the Protesters Failed

And as city manager, I should know: Much has been stated lately with regard to the way union and other protesters were dealt with during the recent Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) ministerial meetings held in our city. These sentiments, which lay accusations and blame against our police department and city officials, are simply rooted in failure -- unions and protesters failed to recruit support from our college campuses, failed to add residents of our poorest neighborhoods to their ranks, failed to disrupt the meetings, and most important, failed to rally public support for their cause.

Union leaders and protesters ignored the fact that Miami is a city built on trade and commerce, widely recognized as the Gateway to the Americas, where hard-working men and women directly benefit from the economic opportunities that come with free trade. Their failure and frustration has led them to engage in a one-sided attack on our police and organizers after their main goals of arousing antitrade passions and disruption of the trade meetings did not materialize.

Such an attack is characteristic of groups that do not use the processes of government and the appropriate forums to air their disputes, preferring instead to level allegations in the media without much basis in fact.

Beyond street protests, those who oppose the trade agreement were given a formal forum to air their disputes. Members of civil-society organizations, including unions and other antitrade groups, had unprecedented access to the trade ministers during a meeting track parallel to that of business leaders -- including equal face-to-face time with the ministers -- to express their concerns regarding the free-trade agreement. Yet this was not enough. Because their message failed to resonate, they now seek other ways to stay in the public eye -- by attacking our police presence as "overwhelming" when in fact our level of preparation was based on the projections of union organizers, who expected crowds in excess of 50,000 to 60,000, many bused in from out of town. Our police also prepared based on the experiences of Seattle, Cancun, Quebec, and countless other cities that saw a reign of chaos take over when so-called peaceful protesters took to the streets against free trade.

When the city mayor and I entered the security perimeter to meet with union organizers, they advocated for the rights of anarchists to "blow some steam," even suggesting we allow the security fence to be toppled as a symbolic gesture. While we negotiated, protesters recognized and attacked our car. These are the stories that go unreported but which gave us a taste of what our police and other security personnel were experiencing and responding to firsthand.

Union leaders and protesters complain because our city would not tolerate any violence, any amount of property damage, nor any loss of life. They failed in their goals. The ultimate story was not how the unions and protesters stopped the meetings, but how city leaders and police did not abrogate their responsibility to maintain the peace. Our gratitude goes to Miami's citizens, especially those of the downtown area, whose patience and hospitality make ours a city worthy of hosting this historic meeting of the hemisphere's trade leaders. We place our trust in them, knowing they will not rush to condemn city leaders and police without first hearing the full story.

We invite all those who have any grievances or complaints to air them before the Citizens Investigative Panel. And while we are prepared to defend our actions, we cannot allow those who failed in their objectives to taint a ministerial meeting being hailed as a great success in all trade and diplomatic circles.

Joe Arriola

Miami City Manager


As an Attorney, I Can Tell You About John Timoney

He thumbs his nose at the Constitution: As a Philadelphian and a member of the R2K Legal Collective, which provided legal support to the protesters and victims of police abuse during and after the 2000 Republican National Convention, when John Timoney was the police commissioner here, I am not surprised to read that he continues to hold in contempt the First Amendment right of freedom of expression and civilian oversight of the police ("Timoney's Urban Warfare," Tristram Korten, December 25). I also saw Timoney's unconstitutional tactics during the World Economic Forum in New York City in 2002, when he served as a security consultant.

As soon as I heard that Timoney was going to be chief of police in Miami during the FTAA meeting, I and several other former members of R2K Legal contacted lawyers and other legal activists in Miami to warn them of the Timoney Method: criminalize legitimate protest, make random and groundless arrests, and then lie to the media and the courts about what happened. When police cracked down in Miami, the only surprise was that Timoney succeeded in surpassing his past atrocities with wanton use of tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets on peaceful protesters and even on Miami residents who just happened to be on the street.

What you will probably see over the next year in Miami, and what we have seen in both Philadelphia and New York, is that these stories of violent protesters and brave police officers will turn out to be total fabrications by Timoney's public-relations staff. When those arrested get to court, the real picture of what happened in the street will emerge and the criminal cases will fall apart. In both Philadelphia and New York, more than 90 percent of those arrested were cleared of any wrongdoing, revealing a clear pattern of systematic false arrests. I expect to see the same in Miami.

I would like to cite Benjamin Franklin on this matter: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." These words have never been more relevant than they are today. We ignore them at our peril. Today the police arrest protesters, but tomorrow they will be coming after you and there will be no one left to protest.

Jamie Graham



All-access pass to the top stories, events and offers around town.

  • Top Stories


All-access pass to top stories, events and offers around town.

Sign Up >

No Thanks!

Remind Me Later >