Daryl Jones, the Man Who Never Met a Conflict of Interest He Couldn't Embrace
Thank you for Jim DeFede's article "Flying High" (February 26), reporting on State Sen. Daryl Jones and his links to the passage of legislation that erodes public disclosure of environmental costs in the reuse of former military bases. Senator Jones, recently nominated to be Secretary of the Air Force, now faces confirmation hearings.
In the last days of the 1996 legislative session, I called Senator Jones's staff to ask whether the senator knew anything about a last-minute effort by Dade County to change a state law affecting state planning requirements for Homestead Air Force Base. Earlier that year a confused Dade County Commissioner Natacha Millan inadvertently led fellow commissioners to change requirements for air-base planning to a higher standard of disclosure according to rules for the development of regional impact. Millan's bungled vote was an amazement, delivering to environmentalists an unexpected gift from a determined foe.
The commission vote, if left uncorrected, could have cost Homestead Air Base Developers, Inc. -- Millan's supporters -- many hundreds of thousands of dollars and would have held them to higher standards of disclosure in proving that their plans would not adversely affect public lands the American people have already paid a great price to protect. But in order to correct her vote, the statutory time deadlines of state law needed to be changed by the Florida Legislature.
Mr. DeFede now reports that in 1996 Senator Jones was integral to the midnight effort that resulted in a last-minute change to the state law, allowing Millan and her allies on the county commission to reverse their votes, shifting the burden of environmental disclosure and its cost to citizens. Though unreported by the press at the time, the event became part of the lore of the Homestead Air Force Base fiasco.
As a member of a Sierra Club delegation, I recently had occasion to meet with Senator Jones. I pointed out that, if confirmed as Secretary of the Air Force, he would be in a powerful position to influence the outcome of a new federal environmental study for the air base, authorized by the White House in December 1997.
The Everglades Coalition, representing more than 40 local and national environmental organizations, had persuaded the Clinton administration that a new federal study was required by federal law because Dade County had expanded the scope of the proposed airport far beyond what had originally been considered by the air force. U.S. Sen. Bob Graham, Jones's sponsor for appointment as Secretary of the Air Force, fiercely opposed the White House decision to require a supplemental environmental impact statement.
Based on this record of partisan sponsorship, I asked Senator Jones whether, if he were to be confirmed as Secretary of the Air Force, he would agree to remove himself from all involvement in the new federal study of Homestead Air Force Base. Senator Jones said he would not agree to recuse himself from the new study unless ordered to do so by the president of the United States.
Around the nation, conservationists are horrified by the precedent Homestead Air Force Base will set for major airport development at the edge of our national parks. Dade County public officials such as Mayor Alex Penelas claim that their primary concern is the economic welfare of South Dade, and that environmental concerns such as aircraft noise, toxic water spewing into pristine Biscayne National Park, the effects on protected wildlife and on Everglades restoration, the loss of agricultural lands, the growth of suburban sprawl are adequately addressed by existing laws.
But in the Homestead Air Force Base fiasco, public officials have squandered so much good faith that any reasonable observer would infer that the consequent trail of litigation can mean only one thing: Dade County and sympathetic elected officials like Sen. Daryl Jones have declared war on our national parks. The American people love our national parks. What is happening here is a national disgrace.
Alan Farago, conservation chair
Sierra Club Miami Group
Your Two Kitchen Knives for My .38 Revolver
Regarding Tristram Korten's article "Shoot Out the Lights" (February 26), it is quite obvious that defense attorney Philip Gerson has no idea what he is talking about when he says that the police officers in question should have "just disarmed her from those knives," referring to his client Gwendolyn Ramsey.
Had Mr. Gerson done any research on the subject, he would have learned that defending yourself against a knife attack is not as easy as it looks on television and in the movies. Furthermore, studies have revealed that someone armed with a knife can seriously wound or kill a police officer before he or she is able to draw a sidearm.
We Come in Peace, You Leave in Pieces
I strongly agree with Gwendolyn Ramsey's attorney, Philip Gerson. There was no intent to harm others. The police officers were not at Ms. Ramsey's home to harm her. The officers were at Ms. Ramsey's home to take her into custody for her own protection and the protection of others.
It was Ms. Ramsey's decision, however distorted by her mental condition, to charge the officers while armed with knives. Perhaps Mr. Gerson himself should try to disarm an emotionally disturbed person, knives in hand, who is charging at him saying she is going to kill him. Largely, officers are not trained to disarm people with knives, nor should they be.
Perhaps Mr. Gerson would rather see a police funeral?
New Times blew it on this one, too. Why not print quotes from both sides of the story in large, eye-catching inserts. For example, "Those officers' lives were in danger. A judge found it was good shooting, that it was justified. The police used extreme caution." The officers reacted appropriately to Ms. Ramsey's actions.
Sgt. Craig Leveen
Coral Gables Police Department
Lock Her Up, Throw Away the Key, and Call Nurse Ratched
Assistant State Attorney Michele Block's depiction or characterization of Gwendolyn Ramsey made me want to laugh. Ramsey can hardly be classified as a "violent criminal." Ramsey's case carries with it an all-too-familiar scent: She flew over the cuckoo's nest, the cops did a Rodney King number on her, and then the courts buried her heart at Wounded Knee.
True justice consists of helping people like Ramsey, not labeling them misfits and locking them up indefinitely. Rehabilitation should fly as readily as bullets. Injustice must not be fought only on the streets but in our courts and jails as well.
They Let the Sunshine In
Lynda Edwards has done a great public service with her recent article "Black Beauty" (February 12). Demonstrating that entrepreneurial drive and spirit will accomplish much, the article was a fascinating trip back in time.
Kudos to David and Lurel Julius for making Miami shine in the Sunlight, in more ways than one. As Miami moves into its second hundred years, we need to know more about the successes of the past and build upon them to improve our future.
Benedict P. Kuehne
More Monkey Business at Metrozoo
I am writing in response to Ted B. Kissell's perceptive analysis of Metrozoo ("It's a Jungle in Here!" January 22). The conflict about who actually controls and operates Metrozoo is a moot point. The nonprofit Zoological Society of Florida has a tremendous influence with the maintenance of the zoo, but if only 42 cents out of every dollar in raised contributions is channeled to the upkeep of the zoo, then something is wrong.
Robert Stewart Denchfield
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you’ll never miss Miami New Times' biggest stories.
- The Five Best Value Contracts in South Florida Sports
- Santa’s Enchanted Forest Protest Planned Over Animal Shows
- Brightline, New Rail Link Between Miami and Orlando, Explained