For years, the FBI has been pushing police to adopt "rapid DNA"
Despite those worries, the Miami Beach Police Department recently revealed it has been quietly running a rapid DNA testing program for months. Since April, MBPD has been testing a single rapid-DNA-scanning machine (without fully disclosing the scope of the program to the public), making it the only department in the nation permitted to "fully field test" the device, according to a letter sent to the city commission.
"Accurate Rapid DNA testing is inevitable in the future of American criminal justice," City Manager Jimmy Morales writes in the letter. "However, the technology first must be proven to work effectively for police crime scene technicians in the field and for detectives who investigate unsolved crimes."
Instead of sending DNA evidence out for lab testing, departments that use rapid-scan technology can simply swab a suspect's cheek, run the evidence through the quick-scan machine (the ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis system, in MBPD's case), and receive results in roughly two hours. In a move that will likely trouble privacy advocates, an order that Chief Dan Oates signed August 11 notes the DNA samples will be entered into the FBI's Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), an ever-growing national database of criminal suspects' biometric data.
MBPD spokesperson Ernesto Rodriguez tells New Times the department takes cheek swabs only from suspects who voluntarily consent to a scan. During the current testing period, MBPD takes two cheek swabs from suspects: One is run through the rapid sampler, and the other is sent to the Miami-Dade County Police crime lab for
For now, if a rapid scan turns up a "high-profile" or "serious" match, the MDPD crime lab has agreed to work with the police department to expedite the standard DNA test. According to a departmental order attached to Morales' letter, Beach cops are also allowed to test samples found at crime scenes, "samples lawfully obtained during the course of a criminal investigation," and samples from dead suspects or human remains.
Here's Rodriguez standing next to the machine, which looks a bit like an office copier:
Morales' letter notes that rapid sampling is not yet recognized as evidence in court — but it is used by the military on enemy combatants, representing yet another instance in which technology developed for the U.S. military has
"Although this technology has been used successfully by U.S. military and intelligence operatives to identify suspected enemies in conflict areas for several years, instrument-produced Rapid DNA profiles are not yet recognized as evidence for criminal prosecutions in American courts," Morales writes in his letter.
But forensics experts and legal analysts have warned against blindly letting rapid-DNA-scanning technology spread without deeply interrogating when, why, and how the technology is used. Civil liberties
In 2012, rapid DNA scans were being used in refugee camps in Turkey to help figure out whether displaced people were related. But even five years ago, the EFF was warning that the technology could later be used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement to hunt down the relatives of undocumented immigrants, for example. EFF lawyer Jennfier Lynch wrote:
However, the real issues with expanded DNA collection—and the issues these documents don’t answer—are whether DNA collection is really necessary to solve the challenges inherent in proving refugee entitlement to benefits; what standards and laws will govern expanded federal, state and local DNA collection and subsequent searches; how DNA will be collected, stored and secured; who will have access to it after it’s collected; and what processes are in place to destroy the DNA sample and delete data from whatever database it’s stored in after it’s served the limited purpose for which it was originally collected. Without answers to these questions, no amount of “social conditioning” can convince those concerned about privacy and civil liberties that expanded DNA collection is a good idea.
The FBI has been lobbying the federal government and the D.C. Legislature to create a national DNA database. In 2015, FBI Director James Comey pushed for a bill called the Rapid DNA Act of 2015, which he said "would help us change the world in a very, very exciting way" by creating a national, searchable DNA network of every criminal suspect in the nation. That bill failed, as did a 2016 version, but another version passed unanimously in the Senate in May 2017 and now awaits House approval. (Sen. Orrin Hatch proposed each version.) The bill would also allow rapid DNA results to be used as evidence in court.
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
The August 11 directive that Chief Oates signed noted that the DNA samples run through the new rapid-testing program will be subsequently entered "into the state's DNA database and to CODIS," the national FBI
Morales' letter noted that the rapid DNA testing system has already led to two biometric matches: DNA recovered from a handgun successfully ID'ed a suspect accused of committing a shooting on Memorial Day weekend, and evidence taken from a car's gearshift was matched with someone who allegedly committed a hit-and-run.
"The FBI will be kept apprised of the progress of the initiative and has agreed to advise us as we proceed forward," Morales wrote.