Showgirls Strip Club Bouncers Broke Patron's Ankle in Bathroom Brawl

If you walk past the Miami-Dade County courthouse this week, you'll probably see a clean-cut Cuban in slacks, a dress shirt, and rimless glasses. Carlos Morales will be holding a large white sign with black lettering that reads, "Judge Victoria Platzer does not represent justice, only the will of the insurance company."

You might assume Morales is just another South Florida foreclosure victim. Ask him his story, though, and you'll realize your mistake. "I was at this strip club," Morales explains in Spanish, pulling out a binder. He opens it to a large, glossy photo of his bloody, swollen face. A more gruesome pic shows his left ankle with a six-inch surgical cut. "The bouncer attacked me."

Morales's legal fight began October 4, 2009, when he visited Showgirls, a club in Cutler Bay where the Turnpike meets South Dixie Highway. Morales was sipping a drink when a stripper started chatting him up. When his eyes kept falling on her bare breasts, she told him to go ahead and touch them, Morales claims. "That's what they do to get you to pay for a private dance," he says. Instead of paying up, Morales went to the toilet. Bad decision.

A bouncer followed him. "What the fuck are you doing with my girl?" the bouncer asked before allegedly punching Morales. When two more bouncers joined the fray, Morales says, he was thrown through the bathroom partition. His shoulder was dislocated and his left ankle was shattered.

But when cops arrived, the bouncers claimed Morales had been caught stealing perfume. He was charged with battery and attempted theft. The theft charge was dropped, and a judge allowed Morales to attend anger management classes to avoid the battery rap. Yet the incident cost him his job. His ankle required surgery.

Morales sued Showgirls a few weeks later. This past January, a jury awarded him $56,085.31. Judge Platzer tacked on another $10,000 for future physical suffering. But Morales isn't satisfied. He wanted $500,000 and thinks he would have gotten it had the judge and his lawyer, Alan Anchell, done their jobs. "They hid evidence and manipulated the jury," he claims.

Anchell insists he did his best for ­Morales. Meanwhile, Platzer says she cannot comment on an open case. Showgirls co-owner Michael Laughlin claims ­Morales started the fight and is lying about it to extort the club. "Carlos Morales has this grand story," he says, "but my guys did not go in there and beat him up."

Morales plans to complain to the Florida Bar about the lawyer and the judge, and to file for an appeal. His one-man picket line continues.

 
My Voice Nation Help
7 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Keithdobrey
Keithdobrey

How are touching bare breasts and "full nude full friction" allowed to be advertised for this club? Isn't that illegal to begin with?

James Copeland
James Copeland

strip bars that is were all the cocaine is dirty cops know that grew up in fort lauderdale fl go to alot of aa meetings you can find out a lot there

BadDude
BadDude

ok so they claim he was stealing perfume in the strip club they don't sell perfume in the first place and he was beat up in the batroom with two bouncer doesn't show in the camara two bouncer following him. I bet the owner delete so it won't bring any evidence.

Mbot
Mbot

It's illegal to have cameras in public bathrooms. In court he said it was the bathroom attendant now he says it's the bouncers.

Mbot
Mbot

This is a one sided article that doesn’t represent what reallyhappened. Carlos Morales was cited that night for theft and battery to which helater plead no contest, coincidentally which is also how he plead on threeother charges in his legal history. If you plead no contest it cannot bebrought up in future civil and (if I am correct) misdemeanor cases. The articlewould have better represented the truth if the reporter would have shown the alleged“large, glossy photo of his bloody, swollen face” which does not exist. Whywould a reporter leave that juicy tidbit out? It would have been nice if they would havealso shown the pictures supplied in the case of the bathroom attendant heattacked and bit in the throat. The security personal couldn’t lift the two menoff each other because Carlos Morales had his teeth planted firmly into thethroat of the bathroom attendant. The reporter also failed to contact the realvictim in the case as listed in the police report and if he did he would haverealized that the bathroom attendant is a sweet, soft spoken, slightly chubbykid who doesn’t have an arrest record, still lives with his mom, and is workingtwo jobs to save up to get his own place. The “reporter” also fails to mentionthat at trial Carlos Morales limped to the stand with the use of a cane to givetestimony. The defense showed, in court, a video of him getting around just fineand video of him at the gym using an exercise bike at Lance Armstrong intensityfor an hour. Carlos Morales, in court, described himself as a body builder. CarlosMorales did not lose his job as is stated in the article. The defense alsoshowed his gym attendance records. Withinthirty days of this article Carlos Morales was back in the gym hitting it hardon a regular basis- even with a broken ankle. Ask yourself this: if threedoormen , each over six feet tall, and a bathroom attendant went in andstomped, kicked, and punched Carlos Morales for the amount of time he claims,where is the picture of a man that got beat up. Where is the bruising up anddown his body? Where is the torn clothing? Where is the broken nose, bloody lipor missing tooth? The answer: “There areno pictures or evidence that supports this claim of group mauling”. He supplieda photo showing slight discoloration of his face and slight puffiness consistentwith rolling around the floor with the bathroom attendant. His ankle had aclean fracture that could also be consistent with falling with the bathroomattendant. I f he would have had three huge “bouncers” kick his ass and punchhim in the face- his rimless glasses would have also been smashed but they weren’t.Prosecutors would have had a field day with such images or proof of this allegedbeat down. Carlos Morales did take pictures in preparation for a lawsuit but nobloody shirt, broken glasses or pictures of this exist. Really??? The biggest thing left out of the article isthat the jury said that Carlos Morales was 60% at fault for the incident. If you steal and attack someone they have aright to defend themselves and if you read all the facts involved with thiscase you will see from the original complaint to now Carlos Morales wants toblame the cops, judge, his lawyer, the defendants lawyers and everyone buthimself. He was awarded money to cover true expenses and Florida law mandatesthat pain and suffering be awarded which the jury did award in the amount of (ifmemory serves me correct) : $1. Florida law mandates a mathematical formulathat raised it to the $10,000. This is a one sided story that without whole setof facts that are part of the record this story becomes pretty boring. Nice jobwith the sensationalism to hurt small business and sell papers

VivianG
VivianG

Strip clubs are very shady when handling those kind of situation. Good luck on your lawsuit...

Mbot
Mbot

This is a one sided article that doesn’t represent what reallyhappened. Carlos Morales was cited that night for theft and battery to which helater plead no contest, coincidentally which is also how he plead on threeother charges in his legal history. If you plead no contest it cannot bebrought up in future civil and (if I am correct) misdemeanor cases. The articlewould have better represented the truth if the reporter would have shown the alleged“large, glossy photo of his bloody, swollen face” which does not exist. Whywould a reporter leave that juicy tidbit out? It would have been nice if they would havealso shown the pictures supplied in the case of the bathroom attendant heattacked and bit in the throat. The security personal couldn’t lift the two menoff each other because Carlos Morales had his teeth planted firmly into thethroat of the bathroom attendant. The reporter also failed to contact the realvictim in the case as listed in the police report and if he did he would haverealized that the bathroom attendant is a sweet, soft spoken, slightly chubbykid who doesn’t have an arrest record, still lives with his mom, and is workingtwo jobs to save up to get his own place. The “reporter” also fails to mentionthat at trial Carlos Morales limped to the stand with the use of a cane to givetestimony. The defense showed, in court, a video of him getting around just fineand video of him at the gym using an exercise bike at Lance Armstrong intensityfor an hour. Carlos Morales, in court, described himself as a body builder. CarlosMorales did not lose his job as is stated in the article. The defense alsoshowed his gym attendance records. Withinthirty days of this article Carlos Morales was back in the gym hitting it hardon a regular basis- even with a broken ankle. Ask yourself this: if threedoormen , each over six feet tall, and a bathroom attendant went in andstomped, kicked, and punched Carlos Morales for the amount of time he claims,where is the picture of a man that got beat up. Where is the bruising up anddown his body? Where is the torn clothing? Where is the broken nose, bloody lipor missing tooth? The answer: “There areno pictures or evidence that supports this claim of group mauling”. He supplieda photo showing slight discoloration of his face and slight puffiness consistentwith rolling around the floor with the bathroom attendant. His ankle had aclean fracture that could also be consistent with falling with the bathroomattendant. I f he would have had three huge “bouncers” kick his ass and punchhim in the face- his rimless glasses would have also been smashed but they weren’t.Prosecutors would have had a field day with such images or proof of this allegedbeat down. Carlos Morales did take pictures in preparation for a lawsuit but nobloody shirt, broken glasses or pictures of this exist. Really??? The biggest thing left out of the article isthat the jury said that Carlos Morales was 60% at fault for the incident. If you steal and attack someone they have aright to defend themselves and if you read all the facts involved with thiscase you will see from the original complaint to now Carlos Morales wants toblame the cops, judge, his lawyer, the defendants lawyers and everyone buthimself. He was awarded money to cover true expenses and Florida law mandatesthat pain and suffering be awarded which the jury did award in the amount of (ifmemory serves me correct) : $1. Florida law mandates a mathematical formulathat raised it to the $10,000. This is a one sided story that without whole setof facts that are part of the record this story becomes pretty boring. Nice jobwith the sensationalism to hurt small business and sell papers

 
Miami Concert Tickets
Loading...