Top

news

Stories

 

But if Romney played the friendly politician, kindness wasn't his specialty at Bain. He was generous to ranking executives, rewarding CEOs with huge bonuses. Yet he tended to treat those below his pay grade as little more than machinery.

Romney has repeatedly claimed to have created 100,000 jobs at Bain, and says that providing work for Americans was a primary company goal.

He makes his case by citing Domino's, Sports Authority and Staples, companies that added jobs after Bain bought in.

But Bain bought Domino's just months before Romney left to run the Salt Lake City Olympics, meaning someone else created those jobs. And he didn't manage Staples or Sports Authority; Bain was a minority investor in both.

By Romney's logic, any large investor — say, the Texas teachers' pension fund — also creates hundreds of thousands of jobs. The boast is so foolish that his campaign has since backed away from it.

Even Kaplan admits that private equity firms rarely create jobs. Workers are seen as costs, and costs are the enemy. According to Kosman, Romney was in truth among the most heinous job killers of them all.

While writing his book, Kosman conducted an interview with a Bain managing partner. The man told him that when Bain was about to buy a company, its partners would hold a meeting. "He said that about half the time [they] would talk about cutting workers," says Kosman. "They would never talk about adding workers. He said that job growth was never part of the plan."

That claim was buttressed by the Associated Press, which studied 45 companies bought by Bain during Romney's first decade. It found that 4,000 workers lost their jobs. The real figure is likely thousands higher, since the analysis didn't account for bankruptcies or factory or store closings.

An example of Romney's cold-blooded approach is his 1994 purchase of Dade International, an Illinois medical-equipment company. He soon merged it with two similar firms, a move that tripled sales.

Once again, he couldn't help but raid the vault, peeling away $100 million for himself and investors at the same time Dade was laying off 1,700 American workers.

After Bain closed a Dade plant in Puerto Rico, human resources manager Cindy Hewitt was asked to lure a dozen of those employees to work in the company's Miami factory.

But that plant soon closed as well. Though Romney was gobbling up millions, Bain still wanted those laid-off employees to repay their moving costs.

"They were treated horribly," Hewitt told the New York Times. "There was absolutely no concern for the employees. It was truly and completely profit-focused."

Yet Bain's molestation wasn't complete. It was trying to sell Dade, but didn't like the offers it received on the open market. So it created an artificial market of its own.

In 1999 it forced Dade to borrow $242 million, which was used to buy back company stock from Bain, Dade executives and their banker, Goldman Sachs.

Bain was again extracting profits with borrowed money. It had pushed Dade's debt to a bracing $2 billion. To help pay for the deal, the company laid off another 367 workers.

But that debt proved too much for Dade's shoulders to carry. Three years later, the company was bankrupt.

Kosman calls it standard Romney operating procedure. To pump short-term earnings, he would essentially "starve a company," whacking not just employees, but customer service and research-and-development funding — the very ingredients of long-term prosperity.

"I think they're one of the worst, at least during Romney's time," Kosman says. "They were very aggressive about dividends. They were very aggressive about borrowing the most money they could. He's very driven to be the best he could be, and that was to be as cutthroat as he could be. But in the process, he hurt a lot of companies and cost a lot of jobs, maybe tens of thousands of jobs."

Kosman says it's telling that Romney never cites companies he actually managed as evidence of his job-building skills.

"If Romney had some stories to tell, he'd use those stories," he says. "I think it's very interesting that he's not telling those stories, because I think they don't exist."

The Welfare Queen

Romney's economic views were on stark parade during this year's Michigan primary. He ripped President Obama for bailing out the auto industry, arguing that it should have been dealt with in his favorite resting place: bankruptcy court.

He was particularly incensed that the president rescued workers' pension funds before covering Wall Street's bad loans.

But his faith in the free market wobbles when his friends need rescuing. Romney just as vigorously defends the $10 billion government bailout of Goldman Sachs, his investment partner at Bain.

After all, Romney frequently assumed the role of welfare queen himself.

In 1988, he bought South Carolina photo-album maker Holson Burnes. In exchange for the firm's promise to build a new factory, the people of Gaffney, South Carolina, gave Bain $5 million in bonds and $200,000 in utility upgrades.

The plant closed just four years later. The 100 jobs there were later shipped to Mexico.

At GSI, he dumped $44 million in pension shortfalls on the federal government. And when he bought mattress-maker Sealy in 1997, he took $600,000 in welfare to move the firm from Ohio to North Carolina.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
14 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
dairyking887
dairyking887

Why does anyone vote for this monster? How has he managed to stay alive for so long in political life? Ah, that's right, he's very, very, very rich. And he's "white" in an era when many European-Americans are deeply, deeply, deeply afraid of "the other," whomever that "other" may be. Why is the de-facto voting position in American political life always to the right, especially on economic issues, when such voting only works to further emaciate the middle class? Why is this conglomerate hedge fund model or business being allowed to destroy our economy? I want to make a decent wage. I want to own a home and have health insurance and enjoy my life. How can I do that when the entire economy is dominated by corporate oligarchs and slave service sector jobs? Where is the hope? Where is the future? Where are any of our political leaders? Do they realize the very existence of our country is at stake?

&lt;&lt; Work at home, $60/h, link
&lt;&lt; Work at home, $60/h, link

A man can know nothing of mankind without knowing something of himself. Self-knowledge is the property of that man whose passions have their full play, but who ponders over their results.

Bob
Bob

It seems that the cards are stacked against the average person just trying to scratch out a living. Why is Bain, or any other company allowed to rape and pillage going companies??? Why when companies go bankrupt in such a manor, Directors aren't held responsible including paying back the proceeds that they obtained???. The laws need to be changed to prevent this type of pillaging, then filing a bankruptcy to let the taxpayers pick up the pieces. If deception is detected, officers should have criminal charges brought against them. When companies borrow money, limits should be placed how much money can be pulled out by company directors. Execs should only be allowed to earn a percentage of the PROFITS not the combined assets. I'm not against company execs making money, but I am against them raping the company, while they make fortunes. Where is the accountability??? It's time that Senate hearings are held to change the laws to help prevent these practices in the future. Oh that's right, The Senate and lawmakers are the ones pulling all the scams and screwing the taxpayers.

Mo_H
Mo_H

Capitalism sucks, it is much better for everyone to be poor and not have any ability to do anything about it. That would be great.

Need we be reminded we do not live in a democracy, we live in a representative democracy. There is a reason the American public is not allowed to run the country, it is because most of us are complete morons and have no idea the economy, politics, or the world works, as evidenced by this article. Keep in mind management SOLD these companies to Bain Capital at their own discretion. If you wanna "blame" someone, blame them for being sufficient greedy to sell their company to a vulture investor. While I have compassion for the tireless unionized workers earning triple overtime who lost their jobs, it comes with the territory and they all know that. You can't work in a paper mill in the modern economy and assume you will be employed for 40 years without hiccup.

And an 88% return is not 88% success, it is in fact averaging an 88% "interest rate" per year on an investor's equity investment.

Guest
Guest

So he had an 88% success rate.

Okay.

pcl
pcl

The idea of taking over a firm, cutting unnecessary costs, laying off unnecessary workers in order to allow a strengthened, more profitable and permanent firm to emerge is in keeping with the principles of capitalism. But pocketing borrowed money while spinning off a company that is so fragile it is almost certain to go bankrupt in the next downturn is not; it's just a legal form of fraud; made legal by corporate limited liability and bankruptcy law, both creations of government. The Republican party has gone from being the party of free enterprise to the party of legalized fraud (though Obama's reaction to this sort of thing is underwhelming, to put it politely). The workers, plants, and alleged "rescue plans" Bain was juggling were just props in a shell game. Conservatives are correct that the people of a nation can't generate wealth by doing nothing but paying each other's bills and changing each other's diapers. But they don't seem to understand that nations are no more likely to get rich from their people ripping each other off.

Brian
Brian

Really everything we hate about capitalism. So the fact that they bought companies that were about to go under and saved many jobs from being lost is something I am suppose to hate? I don't hate capitlism. I love the Free Market. And since the government won't let the free market work we don't see how great it would be with a free market. Prices would come down and we all would be more prosperous. The media must have decided to stop even pretending they are not biased and so they feed us this crap.

nanook5
nanook5

free market myth aside, i hate capitalism a lot more for all the corpses it produces.

Crzystap
Crzystap

this is predictable liberal nonsense. throwing out the facts about the source of success and prosperity, and replacing them with mindless emotional fabrications. even if people believed the garbage about Romney being a villain and a crook, his 5 point lead over Obama speaks volumes about what America regards the president to be.

Bebep
Bebep

Well... you have almost half the country full of mindless morons who still believe the president is not a citizen, that he's a Muslim, and a communist.

About four years ago, the same people crying these ridiculous things would call this "Un-American" to say something negative about THEIR president.

Your 5 point lead (which in April means absolutely nothing at all by the way) doesn't give me fear about Obama not being reelected.

It gives me fear in realizing how fucked up and stupid half the people in this country really are.

Anthonyvop
Anthonyvop

Apparently the author, Pete Kotz has a problem with Capitalism, Profits and Freedom!

Maybe we should forgive him? Perhaps, nobody explained to him that companies like Georgetown Steel, American Pad & Paper, Bain Capital and almost every company in existence. exist for one thing and one thing only.

It isn't to make steel or paper. It isn't to provide benefits or Jobs.

They exist for one thing and one thing only.

TO MAKE MONEY FOR ITS OWNERS. To think otherwise is just jealous, ignorance.

nanook5
nanook5

your argument seems to be that the highest form of capitalism is armed robbery, and we should be okay with that.you seem incapable of peering outside the box. companies under CAPITALISM exist to create profit. traditionally jobs are meant for people's survival.

pcl
pcl

That these companies exist only to make money is correct (and expected). But would that justify a company sending its people out on the street to rob old ladies? If not, why is it OK for the management of a firm to pocket money while raiding their employees pension fund or borrowing money it won't be around to repay, or lobbying for public subsidies based on promises it won't keep. So much for the party of "personal responsibility". If Mitt had to repay all the debts from which he has walked away, he and his family would qualify for food stamps.

 
©2013 Miami New Times, LLC, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Miami

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city