Top

news

Stories

 

Just a few months after being hammered by Kennedy, he set fire to another company.

The Price of Incompetence

The move was classic Bain. Before buying Georgetown, Romney had purchased the Armco steel mill in Kansas City, which had been in business more than 100 years.

"We were setting a lot of records for production at that time," says employee Steve Morrow. "We were making a lot of money, because we were getting profit sharing."

Bain combined Armco with the mill in Georgetown and foundries in Tempe, Arizona, and Duluth, Minnesota, to form the newly christened GS Industries.

Romney purchased Armco with just $8 million down, borrowing the rest of the $75 million price tag. Then he issued bonds — basically I.O.U.s — to borrow even more to pay himself and his investors $36 million.

Within a year, he'd already made four times his initial investment while barely lifting a finger. But he'd also run up a staggering $378 million in debt on GSI's tab.

Steel is an infamously cyclical business, a worldwide commodity prone to the same wild price fluctuations as oil. The Kansas City plant forged parts for equipment used in mining gold and copper, leaving it susceptible to the instability of those markets as well.

Yet the smartest guys in the room thought they could run the plant better than the people setting production records.

"They were getting rid of old managers and hiring new managers that didn't have any steel experience," says Morrow. "Some of the guys were nice guys and everything, but they didn't have a clue what was going on."

Many of the new supervisors were ex-military, people who believed that grown men and women are best motivated by punishment. Before Bain, says Morrow, "everybody got along."

Afterward? "They wanted to run the plant like a disciplinary environment. They wanted to discipline people for getting hurt on the job. They wanted to put us in an environment like a war, where we were always fighting with them."

Romney was charging GSI $900,000 a year in management fees to run the company. The Kansas City mill received $900,000 worth of ineptitude in return.

Although Bain borrowed $97 million to retool the plant so it could also produce wire rods, it left the rest of the facility to rot.

To save costs, Bain went miserly on everything from maintenance to spare parts and earplugs. Equipment deteriorated. Since the new managers didn't know how to repair it, "they'd want to rent a new piece of equipment out instead of maintaining what we had," says Morrow. The waste and inefficiency was breathtaking.

Bain's plan all along was to streamline the company into greater profitability, then reap the rewards with a public stock offering. But the exact opposite was happening. Even Roger Regelbrugge, whom Bain installed as CEO, knew the debt was crushing GSI from within, according to Reuters. If a public offering didn't materialize, the company would collapse.

Steel was about to enter a periodic downturn. Countries around the world were locked in a war of tariffs and government-subsidized production, creating a glut and driving down prices. Romney's strategy of the flip was never meant to endure difficult times.

Workers saw the end coming; they were particularly worried that Bain was badly underfunding their pension plan. So they went on strike in 1997, bringing a traditional Rust Belt flair to the festivities by littering the streets with nails and gunning bottle rockets at security guards.

When it was all over, the Steelworkers' union agreed to wage and vacation cuts in exchange for extra health and pension safeguards should the plant close.

Yet GSI was now hemorrhaging money, says David Foster, the union official who negotiated the deal. He claims that Bain cursed the company by placing its own interests above those of customers or long-term stability.

"Like a lot of private equity firms, Bain managed the company for financial results, not production results," says Foster. "It didn't invest in maintenance or immediate customer needs. All that came second to meeting monthly financial goals."

It would take a few more years of bleeding, but GSI eventually fell to bankruptcy.

The Kansas City mill closed for good; 750 people lost their jobs. Worse, Romney had shorted their pension fund by $44 million. The feds were forced to cover the difference, while workers saw their benefits slashed in bankruptcy court.

The battered Georgetown plant and the foundries in Arizona and Minnesota ultimately were bought out of bankruptcy by new companies. Their workforces were halved.

Still, Romney walked away unbruised. All that debt was technically GSI's, not Bain's. Because he'd repaid himself and his investors just months after the purchase, Romney pocketed millions for running the company into the ground.

"They were clever and ruthless enough to pay their own investors back at a really high return rate," says Foster.

This was the beauty of Romney's racket. Even if he killed a company — and he tended to kill them fairly often — he still made out, leaving others to take the hit.

The Parasitic Capitalist

On the campaign trail, Romney describes his work at Bain as resurrecting distressed companies. In this version, he's the white knight lifting troubled firms from the precipice of failure.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
14 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
dairyking887
dairyking887

Why does anyone vote for this monster? How has he managed to stay alive for so long in political life? Ah, that's right, he's very, very, very rich. And he's "white" in an era when many European-Americans are deeply, deeply, deeply afraid of "the other," whomever that "other" may be. Why is the de-facto voting position in American political life always to the right, especially on economic issues, when such voting only works to further emaciate the middle class? Why is this conglomerate hedge fund model or business being allowed to destroy our economy? I want to make a decent wage. I want to own a home and have health insurance and enjoy my life. How can I do that when the entire economy is dominated by corporate oligarchs and slave service sector jobs? Where is the hope? Where is the future? Where are any of our political leaders? Do they realize the very existence of our country is at stake?

&lt;&lt; Work at home, $60/h, link
&lt;&lt; Work at home, $60/h, link

A man can know nothing of mankind without knowing something of himself. Self-knowledge is the property of that man whose passions have their full play, but who ponders over their results.

Bob
Bob

It seems that the cards are stacked against the average person just trying to scratch out a living. Why is Bain, or any other company allowed to rape and pillage going companies??? Why when companies go bankrupt in such a manor, Directors aren't held responsible including paying back the proceeds that they obtained???. The laws need to be changed to prevent this type of pillaging, then filing a bankruptcy to let the taxpayers pick up the pieces. If deception is detected, officers should have criminal charges brought against them. When companies borrow money, limits should be placed how much money can be pulled out by company directors. Execs should only be allowed to earn a percentage of the PROFITS not the combined assets. I'm not against company execs making money, but I am against them raping the company, while they make fortunes. Where is the accountability??? It's time that Senate hearings are held to change the laws to help prevent these practices in the future. Oh that's right, The Senate and lawmakers are the ones pulling all the scams and screwing the taxpayers.

Mo_H
Mo_H

Capitalism sucks, it is much better for everyone to be poor and not have any ability to do anything about it. That would be great.

Need we be reminded we do not live in a democracy, we live in a representative democracy. There is a reason the American public is not allowed to run the country, it is because most of us are complete morons and have no idea the economy, politics, or the world works, as evidenced by this article. Keep in mind management SOLD these companies to Bain Capital at their own discretion. If you wanna "blame" someone, blame them for being sufficient greedy to sell their company to a vulture investor. While I have compassion for the tireless unionized workers earning triple overtime who lost their jobs, it comes with the territory and they all know that. You can't work in a paper mill in the modern economy and assume you will be employed for 40 years without hiccup.

And an 88% return is not 88% success, it is in fact averaging an 88% "interest rate" per year on an investor's equity investment.

Guest
Guest

So he had an 88% success rate.

Okay.

pcl
pcl

The idea of taking over a firm, cutting unnecessary costs, laying off unnecessary workers in order to allow a strengthened, more profitable and permanent firm to emerge is in keeping with the principles of capitalism. But pocketing borrowed money while spinning off a company that is so fragile it is almost certain to go bankrupt in the next downturn is not; it's just a legal form of fraud; made legal by corporate limited liability and bankruptcy law, both creations of government. The Republican party has gone from being the party of free enterprise to the party of legalized fraud (though Obama's reaction to this sort of thing is underwhelming, to put it politely). The workers, plants, and alleged "rescue plans" Bain was juggling were just props in a shell game. Conservatives are correct that the people of a nation can't generate wealth by doing nothing but paying each other's bills and changing each other's diapers. But they don't seem to understand that nations are no more likely to get rich from their people ripping each other off.

Brian
Brian

Really everything we hate about capitalism. So the fact that they bought companies that were about to go under and saved many jobs from being lost is something I am suppose to hate? I don't hate capitlism. I love the Free Market. And since the government won't let the free market work we don't see how great it would be with a free market. Prices would come down and we all would be more prosperous. The media must have decided to stop even pretending they are not biased and so they feed us this crap.

nanook5
nanook5

free market myth aside, i hate capitalism a lot more for all the corpses it produces.

Crzystap
Crzystap

this is predictable liberal nonsense. throwing out the facts about the source of success and prosperity, and replacing them with mindless emotional fabrications. even if people believed the garbage about Romney being a villain and a crook, his 5 point lead over Obama speaks volumes about what America regards the president to be.

Bebep
Bebep

Well... you have almost half the country full of mindless morons who still believe the president is not a citizen, that he's a Muslim, and a communist.

About four years ago, the same people crying these ridiculous things would call this "Un-American" to say something negative about THEIR president.

Your 5 point lead (which in April means absolutely nothing at all by the way) doesn't give me fear about Obama not being reelected.

It gives me fear in realizing how fucked up and stupid half the people in this country really are.

Anthonyvop
Anthonyvop

Apparently the author, Pete Kotz has a problem with Capitalism, Profits and Freedom!

Maybe we should forgive him? Perhaps, nobody explained to him that companies like Georgetown Steel, American Pad & Paper, Bain Capital and almost every company in existence. exist for one thing and one thing only.

It isn't to make steel or paper. It isn't to provide benefits or Jobs.

They exist for one thing and one thing only.

TO MAKE MONEY FOR ITS OWNERS. To think otherwise is just jealous, ignorance.

nanook5
nanook5

your argument seems to be that the highest form of capitalism is armed robbery, and we should be okay with that.you seem incapable of peering outside the box. companies under CAPITALISM exist to create profit. traditionally jobs are meant for people's survival.

pcl
pcl

That these companies exist only to make money is correct (and expected). But would that justify a company sending its people out on the street to rob old ladies? If not, why is it OK for the management of a firm to pocket money while raiding their employees pension fund or borrowing money it won't be around to repay, or lobbying for public subsidies based on promises it won't keep. So much for the party of "personal responsibility". If Mitt had to repay all the debts from which he has walked away, he and his family would qualify for food stamps.

 
©2013 Miami New Times, LLC, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Miami

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city