In this age of artistic appropriation, everything is fair game

After Duchamp's infamous 1917 urinal, in which the French artist simply added his signature to a bathroom fixture and placed it on display, is authorship still a relevant matter? Sure it's still relevant, except that ever since artists began experimenting with photography, film, Xerox, video, and music sampling, the notion of "originality" never remained the same.

I bring up the issue because of a recent public dispute between two Cuban-born Miami artists over the image of a boat made from folded paper. Nosotros-Us was going to be Laura Luna's public art project for a new monument that would join a series of others honoring Cuban history and culture along Memorial Boulevard (SW Thirteenth Avenue) in Little Havana.

A huge cement sculpture of a folded-paper boat (covered with glazed ceramic containing printed text), Luna's piece would have been placed on the boulevard between 20th and 21st streets. But the plan was challenged when artist Leonel Matheu alleged Luna's sculpture was a copy of one of his original designs.

Laura Luna's boat drawing (below) resembles Leonel 
Matheu's boat sculpture (above), but is she copying 
his idea?
Laura Luna's boat drawing (below) resembles Leonel Matheu's boat sculpture (above), but is she copying his idea?


Through July 31.; 305-444-9360.
Domingo Padrůn Art Gallery, 1518 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Coral Gables

In a June 2 article by El Nuevo Herald reporter Adriana Herrera, Matheu, 38-year-old son of jazz musician Arturo Sandoval, claimed Luna was aware of his designs because some five years ago she had allowed him to use ovens in her ceramics studio to fire a couple of his own porcelain boats. Though the 45-year-old Luna acknowledged helping Matheu, she denied that her sculpture was a copy of his design. "My image doesn't have anything to do with Leonel's symbols. They may have the same shape, but I covered mine with text and the finish is different," she explained.

Matheu countered that the paper boat was "a symbol that has characterized my work for the past twelve years."

Who is right?

Let's go step by step. Paper origami goes back hundreds of years. Sam Randlett in his book The Art of Origami links napkin-folding with the invention of paper in the First Century A.D. We know the Europeans enjoyed boat-folding since the Renaissance (English poet Percy Shelley and French novelist Victor Hugo were origami aficionados).

Paper-boat-folding has been a child's pastime throughout Latin America and particularly in Cuba, where the most important patron saint, La Caridad del Cobre, is famously depicted hovering above three men in a boat during a storm.

After 40 years of refugees making the perilous journey across the Florida Straits, the boat (and the raft) have become icons in the works of contemporary Cuban artists such as Matheu, José Bedia, Los Carpinteros, Arturo Rodriguez, Lydia Rubio, and K-cho, among others.

Exposed to zillions of images (and objects) constantly rehashed within the mainstream, we've become an oversaturated culture of visual connections. Today it is common practice for artists to pick up images, and different ways of presenting them, from other artists' work.

In the Sixties, Andy Warhol reproduced Coca-Cola bottles and Campbell's soup cans and exhibited them as art. In the late Seventies, Richard Prince rephotographed Marlboro ads, while Cindy Sherman took pictures of herself as Barbara Stanwyck, Sophia Loren, and other Sixties female stars. Perhaps the Eighties was the decade of appropriation art, with Sherrie Levine manipulating photographs by Walker Evans and Edward Weston, sculptures by Constantin Brancusi, and paintings by Vincent van Gogh, Piet Mondrian, and many more.

Though artists like Levine, Jeff Koons, Barbara Kruger, and others have been sued for copyright infringement, appropriation has become a legitimate technique for a generation of artists, which in the Nineties included Fred Wilson, Zoe Leonard, Tracey Emin, Lyndal Walker, Maria Kozic, and Glenn Brown -- to name a few. Now they are even appropriating other artists' appropriations.

In some instances a copyrighted photo is used with text over it (Kruger). Some reproduce closeups of images (Levine) or manipulate them (Walker). In other instances the artist pokes fun (Brown) or integrally reproduces the painting with minor changes to bring forth gender or social issues (Wilson).

With appropriation now ubiquitous, who is right in the Luna-Matheu dispute?

Well, it is a fact that Matheu has been using the origami paper-boat image (with a pyramidal sail) in his work for years. But that doesn't make the image his property. It can't be, because he himself took it from a reservoir of images already in the popular mainstream; other Cuban artists before Matheu have used the paper-boat origami with the pyramidal sail.

If Matheu's art consisted only of paper boats, you could accept that that's his lone symbol. But he incorporates the paper boat with other images, such as the square building, the mariner's compass, the old cast-iron bathtub, the five-point star, and a peculiar variation of Mr. Potato Head with a Pinocchio nose. (Matheu comes from a graphic-design background and has a touch for simplifying symbols.) All of these elements together constitute Matheu's style, but it would be ludicrous to presume each is his "property."

Another issue is the previous collaboration between the two artists, which raises the question of artistic influence. Was Luna influenced by Matheu's boat? Given that the boat is not a signature image in Luna's art, I could assume she was influenced by Matheu's work.

And so?

Pablo Picasso did not sue Georges Braque when the latter painted his so-so Grand Nu in 1908 (obviously in the style of Picasso's 1907 Demoiselles d'Avignon). It's also known that Italian Futurism owes much of its formal vocabulary to French Cubism.

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help