By Michael E. Miller
By Ryan Yousefi
By Kyle Munzenrieder
By Sabrina Rodriguez
By Michael E. Miller
By Carlos Suarez De Jesus
By Luther Campbell
By Kyle Munzenrieder
The latest rant is "Devil in a Blue Dress" (May 31), in which he stretches belief by analyzing the negative connotations that a Reno gubernatorial campaign will have for Penelas. Here's news for you, Jim: If Janet Reno runs (and I hope she does and wins), the last thing she would like to call attention to is the Elian Gonzalez affair because she needs as many votes in the Cuban-American community as she can scrape together. So her camp won't be replaying any old footage in which she's pitted against one of the community's most popular politicians (like it or not, Jim). And the other camp won't replay it either because Reno comes across as the winner.
As far as Ted Koppel's Nightline, I wondered why Koppel chose to qualify as "talking behind her back" statements Penelas made at a press conference, in the middle of a controversy the whole nation was watching, where every major news outlet was present with cameras and microphones. Maybe Koppel decided it would make better television if he could provoke a heated exchange between Reno and Penelas. Hey, it worked for Jim DeFede. I can picture him, late at night, sitting in a recliner with the remote in hand, bathed in the sickly blue light of the TV while he rewinds that scene over and over and giggles. What a sad picture.
DeFede and Reno
With those backwoods nose-pickers on the wane, she's home free: Jim DeFede writes that "historically any Democrat who hopes to win statewide office needs to capture 25 to 30 percent of the Cuban-American vote." That conventional wisdom has been changed by the influx of new Hispanic groups and other minorities into Florida. The 2000 census will attest to this. Another result of the influx: the diminished voting strength of Florida's backwoods nose-pickers. Couple that with the voting mania these new arrivals will show in 2002 and Janet Reno has a solid shot.
Reno's Rotten Job
Free weekly advised to read its own back issues: I live in the Atlanta area and about six months ago found the New Times Website. I began reading back issues of the paper. Your reporting is first-rate, though I don't always agree with your politics. Over the past few months I have been reading quite a bit in these back issues about Janet Reno and her tenure at the Dade County State Attorney's Office.
Today I found "Janet Reno's Greatest Hits" (October 10, 1990) and was absolutely appalled! Of all the "investigations" her office began against public officials during the Eighties, she could bring only five to trial? That is an outrage. What makes it worse is that, as governor, she could be the person responsible for appointing special prosecutors in situations where the locals can't or won't handle the cases.
I hope New Times will spend time digging through its own archives over the next months and remind the people of Florida what a rotten job she did both as State Attorney and as Bill Clinton's attorney general. Put aside your pro-Democrat bias and give us some really hard-hitting investigative reporting. Please?
Poor Communities Rich with Hope
Wake up and check out this quiet revolution: Regarding Susan Eastman's article "With Enough Money" (May 24), about the West Perrine Community Economic Development Corporation (CDC), the South Florida Community Development Coalition takes exception to the representation that the West Perrine CDC has not lived up to its charge in revitalizing West Perrine.
The fact is that without the work and commitment of the CDC, West Perrine would have seen little or no economic or housing activity in recent years. For the best indicator of the effectiveness of the CDC's efforts, one need look no further than the increasing property values for homes in West Perrine, which rose by more than $10,000 over the past two years.
It's particularly unfortunate that New Times chose to use Miami-Dade County's Audit and Management Services Department's audit report in evaluating Miami-Dade's numerous community development corporations without taking into account the perspective of the South Florida Community Development Coalition that the department's audit was neither fair nor factually accurate.
Readers should be aware that the audit report mentioned in the article contains significant errors and biases. In discussing one particular CDC, for example, the report criticizes an organization for delays in their production of affordable-housing projects without mentioning that the delays were entirely the fault of local government. It took more than two years (!) to issue a routine environmental clearance, which held up the entire project. Instead, time and time again, the audit report never took into account the systemic barriers, often imposed by the county itself, that CDCs universally confront in their venture-development activities in low-income communities.