By Michael E. Miller
By Allie Conti
By David Villano
By Jose D. Duran
By Michael E. Miller
By Allie Conti
By Kyle Swenson
By Luther Campbell
McIntire: What Was the Purpose?
If it was to inflict pain on widow and daughter, you succeeded: I am a retired college professor living in Colorado. I was a colleague of the widow of Alex McIntire, the subject of David Villano's article “Admired in Life, Reviled in Death”(October 19). I suspect that by now the editor of New Times has become immune to expressions of disappointment and outrage, so no doubt my communication will have no effect on any similar future behavior. Nevertheless I feel duty-bound to make the attempt.
Mr. Villano's story is built around two historical facts: Alex McIntire is dead (presumably by his own hand), and Lisa Hamilton claims that Alex sexually molested her. There is a good deal of circumstantial evidence to infer that Alex did commit suicide and that, indeed, he did sexually molest his stepdaughter. Although improbable, there are alternative explanations for Alex's death, and as the story makes clear, Ms. Hamilton's charges “remain unproven allegations.” And although the story suggests the two events are connected, that too is an inference, not a fact.
When I heard that New Times was pursuing this story, my first question was: Why? While Alex had been featured in an article in the Miami Herald's defunct Tropic magazine, he clearly was not a public official, nor was he in any position of public trust. Was it simply because he was well liked? Because he was very smart? Was the purpose of the article to show that well-liked people can have a dark, private side? Or that very smart people do terrible things? If the motive was either or both, then it seems to me the story certainly had no news value and little if no human-interest value. (The topic has been covered fairly well over the past 2500 years, beginning with Sophocles' Oedipus Rex.)
When I discussed this with Alex McIntire's widow, she told me that one of the New Times reporters said the purpose was to assist in the “healing” of Alex's stepdaughter. Such a sanctimonious excuse is beneath New Times; newspapers are not vehicles for promoting mental health. If Ms. Hamilton wants to be “healed” and get on with her life, there are a number of resources available to her. Judging from her statements in the story, however, she doesn't want to be “healed” just yet. She wants revenge. And New Times assisted her in getting revenge -- not on Alex but on the people who thought well of him, on his widow and particularly on their daughter. You certainly made it graphically clear that he was not the person they thought he was. Congratulations!
You should be particularly proud of how this article will affect his daughter. It was not enough to endure the trauma of her father's death. She needs to know the full details of how he killed himself. It is not enough to hear rumors that her father may have done some awful things years ago. She needs to know that he had oral sex with his stepdaughter. Good for you for getting those details in.
Three years ago my son was looking for a job in journalism. He had been writing a column for a newspaper in Miami Beach. He interviewed with some of the staff of Miami New Times. Later, before he heard from New Times and before he took another position, I asked him if he would like to work for New Times. His response was prophetic: “I need a job, but those people [at New Times] are sharks; they'll do anything to sell papers.” He is right. Moreover you haven't the honesty to be upfront about it. At least the National Enquirer and the Star make no bones about what they are.
McIntire: Courage in Pursuit of the Truth
My own life story retold: I ask that you do not publish or reveal my name to anyone, as I have lived in South Florida for a long time and would prefer to keep this information in the hands of only a few. You may contact me, however. I will gladly provide additional information or elaborate on my response, especially if it will help to counteract the responses of Alex McIntire's supporters. With that said let me begin.
I am astonished at the courage displayed by New Times writers, editors, and staff at the compiling and publishing of “Admired in Life, Reviled in Death.” Although reading the story provided the gruesome, revolting details of Lisa Hamilton's life, I could've easily guessed the article's content by the headline.
The story was a carbon copy of my life at the hands of my grandfather. He too was an outstanding citizen of intelligence and charm. As an active member of the Catholic church in our town, he modeled himself as a man of virtue and decency. And like Lisa, I blamed myself for his weakness, his perversion, his tyranny. Also I supported the façade he so meticulously created in the hopes of saving our family unity and my mother's relationship with her beloved parents.
I became an outlet for my grandfather's demonic obsessions at the age of seven, and like Lisa was not released from them until the age of fourteen. I too did not speak of my experience for many years and suffered silently until I was almost twenty, at which time I confided to my mother. Eventually she revealed the information to my father, who actually was a man of virtue and decency (and who, ironically, my grandfather did not approve of), and thus began the years of painful healing.