By David Villano
By Jose D. Duran
By Michael E. Miller
By Allie Conti
By Kyle Swenson
By Luther Campbell
By Frank Owen
By Allie Conti
Lolita: A Whale Who Spins a Web
Lissette Corsa's recent article on Lolita ("Livin' la Vida Orca," July 8) was great! I am working for Lolita's freedom along with Howard Garrett, though I do it differently. You mentioned schoolchildren from Washington and their letters and petitions to Wometco CEO Arthur Hertz.
I helped assemble that group, which calls itself Lolita's Legion. It has grown from 50 children to over 40 chapters worldwide. I hope you will visit our Website, which is also available in Spanish and French, at www.geocities.com/Rainforest/Canopy/8126. There you will find our accomplishments, our aims, and a list of schools and kids' groups that are actively seeking Lolita's release.
Don Your Fins, Damned Sloth, and Start Swimming!
The article on Howard Garrett and freeing the Orca was wonderful. It reached me all the way here in Vancouver, Washington. I am extremely impressed that your publication would go all out for this type of information.
We've been learning for years now that fast food is bad for our health and that animal abuse breeds violence among children. Yet we carry on every day supporting the very things that destroy our well-being. We are acting like a bunch of ignorant fools! No wonder human beings think life is hard. We are too darn lazy and self-concerned to improve!
I say free that beast and stop making these greedy fools (aquarium owners) rich by dragging kids to inhumane acts!
Engineering Lolita's Freedom Through Meditation
What a great article! Lolita not only changed Howie's life, she changed mine. After hearing about Lolita back in 1996, I left a job as an industrial engineer in Pennsylvania and moved to the San Juan Islands to be near Lolita's family.
Sea creatures affect me like they affect Howie. I've written a book called When a Dolphin Walks on Land: Healing Body, Mind, and Emotions that is dedicated to Lolita. I also lead a global marine meditation each fall equinox.
This Whalehead Has a New Nit to Pick
"Livin' La Vida Orca" (great title) was a good read and brought out all sides and most of the history of the Lolita controversy. There has been an important recent development, however. A check of Miami-Dade County building records turned up 1969 architects' drawings that show part of the Seaquarium whale pool is only ten feet deep. This area must be at least twelve-feet deep.
On July 1 "Riptide" stated that "Miami New Times made national news this past week." Were you really bragging about publishing a classified ad for an underage prostitute? (You made news when a cop who ran the call girl's brothel was busted.) Is this a feather in your cap or are you baiting your readers? If it's the former, your idea of notoriety is skewed. Let me write this in my log: "New Times's claim to fame for the first week in July, 1999: It did not break a story. It did run a sleazy ad."
How about some clear writing? You also said, "Although such advertising is protected by the First Amendment...." Based on your preceding recitation, this could have been interpreted that advertisers have a right to advertise. That is not true. A better statement would have been that the First Amendment protects the content of ads in the same way it protects the content of books, magazines, and the editorial content of newspapers: by preventing government censorship. No one can sue Miami New Times under the First Amendment if the newspaper censors ads, nor can they legally force your newspaper to accept an ad. You do not have to run any ad you don't want to run. You are permitted to censor.
In the last paragraph you admit that you run "sleazy" ads but attempt to offset this by ticking off some recent journalistic honors. This reminds me of the serial killer who asks us to temper our condemnation because he bakes cookies for children after each girl-scout kill.
"Riptide," methinks you're being pulled under.
Bringing Valet Parking to the Needy
I read with interest Jen Karetnick's review of Soyka ("Image Isn't Everything," June 24). I have only been there twice, both times for a quick bite, and I wasn't overly impressed. I have no quarrel with her characterization.
I would, however, like to call attention to one area of her article that portrays a total lack of understanding of the neighborhood. I find this misunderstanding slightly ironic because New Times's office is only a few blocks from where I reside, the Charter Club at NE 36th Street and Biscayne Boulevard.
Please understand that it's not particularly relevant that there is much parking available nearby, and Ms. Karetnick is wrong when she calls valet parking "pretentious." Neither my friends nor many who live in my building would enter this restaurant if the valet option were unavailable.
I am surprised Ms. Karetnick would refer to "turning around the area's decaying urban sprawl," then miss the fact that valet parking was likely one of Mark Soyka's best decisions. Please give credit where credit is due. Or at least don't put Mr. Soyka down for having insight into his market. That was undeserved and very unfair.