By Michael E. Miller
By Ryan Yousefi
By Kyle Munzenrieder
By Sabrina Rodriguez
By Michael E. Miller
By Carlos Suarez De Jesus
By Luther Campbell
By Kyle Munzenrieder
How long before the out-of-touch, self-serving commission puts Kennedy on the developer's auction block?
DeFede Takes on the Christian Coalition ... Homophobia Takes a Hit
I read with great interest Jim DeFede's article "A Day of Reckoning" (December 10). Mr. DeFede's obvious viewpoint is that people who agree with his position on the ordinance are good. People who disagree are bad.
Referring to members of the Christian Coalition who spoke against the ordinance, Mr. DeFede writes: "Every one of their speakers invoked religious doctrine to argue against the ordinance." Good heavens! American citizens who allow their religious faith to inform their views on political issues! What has this nation come to? Katy Sorenson, on the other hand, allowed that she was "feeling pretty Zen about the whole thing." I guess the real problem isn't allowing faith to enter the political arena, but rather permitting a biblically based Christian viewpoint.
The most fascinating, or at least telling, part of the article was Mr. DeFede's report that the six commissioners who voted against the ordinance "had nothing to say." He then goes on to make the interesting comment that their votes were "rooted in fear, ignorance, and bigotry," and were "indefensible" and "manifestly unjust." I'm just wondering: Does Mr. DeFede have a crystal ball, unavailable to us poor, unenlightened, non-media types, that allows him to see into the thoughts and attitudes of others, even when those thoughts aren't verbalized? Mr. DeFede's article does indeed reveal some serious fear, ignorance, and bigotry, but it isn't from those six council members. Perhaps this article should have been written entirely in the first person.
Come on over to Miami and Day That, Bad Boy
I am writing in response to "A Day of Reckoning." I do not know Mr. DeFede or Ms. Alonso. I happened to come across this column on Yahoo. I was struck by the petty, attacking tone that Mr. DeFede displayed toward Ms. Alonso. The personal attack on her intelligence and likableness seemed unwarranted. It also puzzles me how Mr. DeFede is so certain that the tirade occurred. Why did Mr. DeFede accept one account, unless it was only to support his point of view. I've always heard that ad hominem arguments are used by those who can't make a cogent argument. The whole tone of the argument was offensive to me. Those who disagree with Mr. DeFede are cynical and oppressive. Those who agree are standing tall. If this item reflects the quality of Mr. DeFede's writing and thought processes, then I am blessed not to be a New Times subscriber.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
End the Hate, Start the Lo-o-ove!
My compliments to Jim DeFede and New Times for "A Day of Reckoning." Those who want to deprive gays of the rights given to the rest of us show the height of ignorance.
The next time any of them suggest that people choose their sexual preference, I suggest they ask themselves the following questions: Who helped them pick the gender they like to hold close? And when? For those who call themselves Christians and suggest that Christ would reject homosexuals, please find the passage in the Bible where Christ was anything but kind and loving to the people he met. (With the exception of bankers and moneylenders, of course.)
It is a very difficult thing to be different. Blacks, Indians, women, Jews, Chinese, gays, and even the Irish have been persecuted, but they are all God's children. He (or is it She?) made us all in His (or Her) likeness. Isn't it time we stop hating and giving high-sounding reasons for it?
Sometimes it's hard to tell if the haters are ignorant themselves, or if they are trying to pump up a shallow ego by attracting the praise or votes of ignorant people. In any event we need an end to the hate.
Mr. DeFede, please keep up the good work.
John A. Brennan
Letter Writer: Let My People Go
Mr. DeFede seems to put away his usual humorous tone when addressing Miami-Dade County commissioners' recent vote on the so-called gay rights ordinance. Though I consider myself an unabashed supporter of human rights, I do find some fault with the ordinance.
Instead of fighting to put more groups on this ordinance and cause greater division in our community, wouldn't it make more sense to simplify the ordinance? Does not everyone with a sexual orientation have a religious belief, even if it's atheism? And does not everyone with a religious belief have a country of origin? And does not everyone with a nationality belong to a racial group or combination of races? And does not everyone who is a member of a racial group or combination of racial groups have a gender? And does not everyone who has a gender also have a species?