By Michael E. Miller
By Ryan Yousefi
By Kyle Munzenrieder
By Sabrina Rodriguez
By Michael E. Miller
By Carlos Suarez De Jesus
By Luther Campbell
By Kyle Munzenrieder
Rather, Heffernan, their American government teacher, is facetiously making a point about the U.S. Constitution: Religious freedom ends where illegal activity begins. She is whipping eighteen of her brightest students into fighting trim for the "We the People" competition, an annual contest in which high schoolers from around the nation display their expertise regarding the Constitution. Last month Our Lady of Lourdes won the Florida Congressional District 18 title and advanced to the state level, which is being staged in Orlando this week. (If they win there, it's on to Washington, D.C., for the national finals in April.)
The remark about dog-slashing unleashes a crescendo of comments about religions that use poisonous snakes and peyote. "Girls, focus," Heffernan says in a calm but firm tone. The students turn their attention to a classmate at the front of the room who is reciting prepared remarks about how the Bill of Rights balances the rights of individuals against the greater good.
"My right to swing my fist ends where the other's nose begins," she says, quoting former Supreme Court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. The adage is a favorite among the girls; it illustrates the kind of reasoning that Heffernan has instilled in her students, and which led Our Lady of Lourdes to victory at the "We the People" national finals last April. And in 1994.
It is also the kind of reasoning that can be outright seditious in Miami's Cuban exile community -- the community in which most of the girls on Heffernan's elite squad were raised.
Her students may appear to be the epitome of conformity in their school uniforms -- navy slacks with white-and-blue-striped polo shirts or light blue oxford shirts. But the views they have come to adopt, as a result of Heffernan's intensive training sessions, have made for some dicey dynamics at home.
Take, for instance, the controversial case of Peggi McKinley, who was removed from Miami-Dade County's film advisory board this past September after she suggested that musicians from Cuba be allowed to perform at a music conference in Miami. Singer Gloria Estefan later criticized Commissioner Bruce Kaplan for dumping McKinley.
"I was, like, what's the big deal?" says seventeen-year-old Monica Leal, standing in the corridor outside Heffernan's second-floor room after practice. "My mom didn't really care, but my grandfather was really upset [with Estefan]. Basically the Cuban community got upset because [they thought] she advocated giving Fidel the opportunity to come and spread his ideas or something ... but it's just not like that. The United States stands for the right of every individual, even if you're here visiting. If we believe it for ourselves, we have to believe it for everybody, you know?"
Notes Miriann Guazzini, the only junior on a team of seniors: "Even if they are ambassadors for Castro, we do believe in freedom of ideology. I mean, I can be a communist anywhere and still have certain natural rights." With a laugh, she adds, "No, I'm not communist."
Teammate Melissa Zirini, whose parents emigrated from Cuba in the Sixties, cites the case of Rosita Fornes. The Cuban singer was forced to cancel a Miami Beach concert in September 1996 amid threats of violent protests by exiles accusing her of being a Castro sympathizer. She also canceled several appearances in July of that year after a Molotov cocktail crashed through a window at Centro Vasco, where she was to have performed. "You have the right to protest all you'd like, but it ends when you infringe on someone else's individual rights," Zirini insists.
"If she's given the liberty in her own country to come here, then what right do we have, a country that embodies those rights, to deny her that and to belittle the few rights she has in her own country?" Leal adds.
Heffernan says she was appalled by the degree of intolerance in Miami when she moved here from Connecticut twenty years ago. But she sees a generational shift taking place between her students and their elders. "It's interesting how the children of these people and the grandchildren of these people have embraced the Constitution so much that they are probably at the opposite end [of the spectrum in] the amount of acceptance they have for all religious groups, all races, every type of group, sexual orientations, everything. They are so much more open, whereas their parents and their grandparents have embraced the country but haven't quite embraced the principles."
Indeed Heffernan's students espouse a traditionally "liberal" position on issues totally unrelated to exile politics -- such as a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down the Communications Decency Act (and thus allowing pornography to remain on the Internet). "Some people felt the [Act] was unconstitutional because it limited your First Amendment right to free speech and free expression," Guazzini explains. "It was a conflict between individual rights versus the common welfare, and we saw the [court] again tip toward individual rights."
Guazzini says her parents take "a more conservative" view of the issue than she does. "They would rather their children not find pornographic material on the Internet.... They find [the ruling] to be a little too liberal."
Often to the chagrin of their parents, Heffernan's budding constitutional scholars have also taken up the issue of abortion. They insist that the Catholic Church's moral stance against abortion be kept separate from the legal aspect of the issue. Even though most of her students personally oppose abortion, they defend a woman's constitutional right to have one.
Last month at the District 18 competition team member Alejandra Chamorro explained to a panel of three lawyers how the Supreme Court arrived at its 1973 decision guaranteeing a woman's right to an abortion: "In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ... said that since the fetus cannot live outside the woman's body, it is a part of her own body. So it is a privacy within her own body. And we have to protect the right of that woman to do whatever she wants with her own body, because it is her own."
The most daunting volley of questions at the district level was hurled by two lawyers from the law firm of Holland and Knight, and one from the firm of Kozyak Tropin and Throckmorton. The last, Adam Raybin, bore down on the Lourdes team, asking why the Supreme Court should be able to strike down a law passed by a popularly elected Congress. "Do you believe that Congress has the right to legislate away the current right to burn a flag in protest? Those people in office are representing the will of the people, and if they're put there based upon your vote or the majority of the people's vote, don't they have a right to pass, even if it be upon their own moral beliefs or the majority's moral beliefs, what they think is right?"
After a brief pause, seventeen-year-old Ana del Cerro stated that, yes, lawmakers have the right to pass laws, but then rattled back: "Their moral beliefs could infringe on their decisions, and as I have previously said, the judicial branch is there to objectively -- not subjectively, objectively -- interpret the Constitution and the people's rights. Because of the fact that their moral beliefs may come into an issue -- or their political passions -- that is why it is very necessary for there to be somewhat of a check through judicial review."
In the end, Our Lady of Lourdes took home a first-place trophy for District 18, beating MAST Academy and Southwest High. (Jackson won in District 17, Palmetto in District 20, and Killian in District 21.)
Outside the county commission chambers, where the results of the district competition were announced, Heffernan revealed a key to her strategy: "The one thing I always try to teach them is that you can't think with your heart. You have to think with your head." During a round of competition last year, for example, the father of one student lowered his head in anguish as his daughter explained how a correct interpretation of the Bill of Rights would protect homosexuals against discrimination, just as it would protect any group.
"It was the most wonderful answer, and all she did was stand for constitutional principles," Heffernan recalls, beaming. "And when they were finished, one of the judges said, 'I wish that if I ever need a lawyer, you would be available.'