By Juan Barquin
By Amy Nicholson
By Alan Scherstuhl
By Travis Cohen
By Juan Barquin
By Stephanie Zacharek
By Amy Nicholson
By Juan Barquin
None of which is meant to disparage Peter Coyote, the actor. (Well, okay, maybe just a little.) While not often mentioned in the same breath as De Niro, Pacino, or Depardieu, Coyote has had his share of screen moments. He wasn't bad in E.T., and you can't blame The Legend of Billie Jean solely on Coyote. But he desperately lacks presence. Even when Pacino plays world-weary (e.g., Sea of Love), he lights up the screen. Coyote drains it. He has the charisma of Peter Fonda, the animal magnetism of Buck Henry.
Or he did, until Polanski got hold of him. In Bitter Moon, Coyote plays a garrulous, amoral, dissipated scumbag who insists on regaling an uptight Brit (Hugh Grant, of course) with the alternately titillating and repulsive tale of how he ended up in a wheelchair. The director tries to overcome Coyote's natural reserve by goading the actor over the top into a portrayal that borders on burlesque. The technique is the subject of much controversy: Owen Gleiberman of Entertainment Weekly says, "If you want to see truly bad acting, watch the talented Peter Coyote debase himself here. [He is] at his frothing worst." J. Hoberman of the Village Voice counters, "Coyote gives the best movie performance of his career." Because Coyote's role is at the heart of Bitter Moon, your final opinion of the movie swings largely on your opinion of Coyote. Add this reviewer to the Gleiberman camp. Perhaps Brando himself couldn't have made this picture work, but at least he'd have made it interesting. In fact, to get a feel for what Bitter Moon is like, try to imagine Last Tango in Paris with, say, Woody Harrelson in the lead. Not a pretty picture, is it?
Polanski is no stranger to controversy, and Bitter Moon has generated more than its share (as has Kika, but that's another story). In addition to the Coyote conundrum, much conjecture has cropped up about how closely the protagonist's views on obsessive love, sadomasochism, and off-center eroticism parallel the director's own. The casting of Emmanuelle Seigner, Polanski's nubile, young, real-life wife, as the object of Coyote's love-lust-degradation-hatred only fuels the speculative fires.
A third flap has arisen as to whether Bitter Moon was meant to be funny. Early press releases positioned the movie as a kinky, sexually explicit depiction of a dangerously dysfunctional and self-destructive relationship as it plunges from the euphoric intoxication of innocent love into the despairing pits of decadence and self-loathing. But then the film was screened at a few festivals where viewers laughed openly at the purple dialogue and the bizarre characters, and suddenly it's being marketed as an ironic mix of psychodrama and dark humor. Certainly there are one or two funny scenes A my favorite being the one in which Coyote, in the throes of ecstasy while being enthusiastically fellated by one of his conquests, flails about uncontrollably in search of some purchase and ends up grabbing and nearly strangling the woman's poodle -- but the majority of them are funny chiefly because they're so bad. As in unintentionally.
Lines such as "Eternity for me began one fall day in Paris aboard the 96 bus," "We lived on love and stale croissants," "I loved her but our credit was running out. We were headed for sexual bankruptcy," and "I pressed my lips against hers like you mash out a butt in an ashtray" are truly dreadful, but it is never clear that the author intended them as parody. And the sight of Coyote in a pig mask and black bikini briefs lying on his back, snorting and twitching his arms and legs as part of a humiliating S&M scenario is downright embarrassing. You want to avert your eyes, which runs pretty much counter to the general concept of what movies are all about.
Still, even though I hated the film as I sat through it, upon reflection I have to admit it's more a judgment call than most. You could make the case that it's a wicked comedy of erotic obsession, Polanski's best work since Chinatown, as Film Comment has done. Or you could write it off as two hours and twenty minutes of glossy, ambitious Eurotrash smut, as I am inclined to do. Either way, it's a film that only Roman Polanski could have made.
Unlike Bitter Moon, Pedro Almod centsvar's Kika was clearly envisioned as a comedy. Almod centsvar is one of the few directors in the world today capable of matching Polanski kink for kink, and his latest film does just that. It's much funnier, and unencumbered by the pretentious pseudointellectual baggage. But it is every bit as controversial.
The centerpiece is an extended rape sequence played for laughs. Now, I do not find anything funny about the subject of rape. Nor, I daresay, would the majority of the Miami Film Festival audience who viewed the film with me in February. Yet the scene brought down the house with the kind of unrestrained belly laughs that go on so long they drown out the next two or three punch lines in succession. It is a sign of Almod centsvar's genius that he could take a subject as loaded as rape and turn it into a side-splitter. This is one of the filmmaker's trademarks -- juxtaposing slapstick and melodrama to maximum effect.
But even Almod centsvar can't do much with Peter Coyote, who sleepwalks through his role of a freeloading serial killer with all the personality of a railroad tie. Almod centsvar was smarter than Polanski, however A he limits Coyote's time on-screen so that the sullen American is just one mismatched part of an otherwise stellar ensemble that includes Veronica Forque as the unsinkably optimistic makeup artist of the title, Alex Casanovas as Kika's boyfriend Ram centsn, an uncommunicative visual artist specializing in women's lingerie, Victoria Abril as a TV tabloid variety show host with a very theatrical scar, and Almod centsvar favorite Rossy de Palma as Kika's gay maid Juana.
The story revolves around Kika's relationship with Ram centsn. Once again, however, Almod centsvar juggles nearly as many subplots as characters. The director is prepossessed with films featuring an actress in crisis, and Kika is no exception. All the usual villains take their turns being lacerated by Almod centsvar's blade; self-appointed intellectuals, politicians, and shameless TV personalities all get theirs. And even the sympathetic characters have their kinks. Haunted by his mother's death, which he thinks was a suicide, Ram centsn maintains a shrine to her memory. Kika and Ram centsn's sex life is less than stellar, so Kika occasionally turns to Ram centsn's brother (Coyote) to fill her needs. Juana is a mustachioed lesbian with the hots for Kika. A pragmatist by nature, Juana now and then sleeps with her perpetually horny brother Pablo to keep him from exploding because of testosterone buildup. Old Pablo is quite a charmer -- a compulsive career criminal and former porno movie star whose IQ is exceeded only by the length of his penis.
Much as John Waters's Serial Mom marks a welcome return to form, so too does Kika find Almod centsvar back at top of his game. Not that Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down! and High Heels were bad films, but they were disappointments for recent converts who had come to expect the madcap humor and imaginative irreverence of Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown. Kika is as crazed, as funny, as schizo, as serious, and as accomplished as anything the director has done. Unlike Polanski, he beat the Coyote factor.
Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!